Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25279199›Full record

ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2014

Survival outcomes and progonostic factors of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients following surgical resection: Adjuvant therapy is a favorable prognostic factor.

Haixia Yang, Jiupeng Zhou, Xin Wei, Fan Wang, Huadong Zhao, Enxiao Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable cholangiocarcinoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Therapy in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Haixia YangDepartment of Medical Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, P.R. China.
Jiupeng ZhouDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sengong Hospital of Shaanxi, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710300, P.R. China.
Xin WeiDepartment of Medical Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, P.R. China.
Fan WangDepartment of Pediatrics, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, P.R. China.
Huadong ZhaoDepartment of General Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710038, P.R. China.
Enxiao LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate survival and prognostic factors for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) following surgical resection and evaluate the effects of postoperative adjuvant therapy (AT) on overall survival (OS). We retrospectively collected clinical and pathological data between March, 2008 and December, 2013. The Kaplan-Meier method and the COX regression model were used to evaluate the OS and prognostic factors of 105 postoperative ECC patients, of whom 32 had received AT. The patients were stratified into seven risk subgroups and the survival rates were compared within each subgroup between patients who received AT and those who did not. The results demonstrated a median OS of 17.6 months, with 1- and 3-year survival rates of 67.9 and 19.5%, respectively, for the entire cohort. On univariate analysis, preoperative cholangitis, non-R0 surgical margins, poor differentiation grade, stage 3/4 and lymphatic metastasis were identified as adverse prognostic factors. AT was not significantly associated with improved OS. However, the subgroup analysis revealed that the effect of AT was significant only in the lymphatic metastasis group (median OS, 21.6 vs. 10.4 months; and 3-year OS, 16.6 vs. 0%, respectively; P=0.02). The survival curves of the AT and non-AT groups were significantly different only for node-positive patients. The COX regression model identified lymphatic metastasis, surgical margins and AT as independent prognostic factors for ECC. A negative resection margin may reduce the mortality rate following surgery by 47%. By contrast, lymph node metastasis was associated with a 2.18-fold higher mortality rate for ECC patients. Postoperative AT contributed to a 0.45-fold mortality rate compared to non-AT ECC patients. Therefore, we concluded that AT is a favorable prognostic factor for ECC patients and it may prolong the survival of patients with lymphatic metastasis. Our data suggest that postoperative AT should be recommended for node-positive ECC patients.

Indexed as

adjuvant therapyextrahepatic cholangiocarcinomaprognosissurvival

Identifiers

PMID25279199
PMCPMC4179817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.