Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25279138›Full record

ArticleFluids and barriers of the CNS2014

A computerized neuropsychological test battery designed for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Anders Behrens, Anders Eklund, Eva Elgh, Cynthia Smith, Michael A Williams, Jan Malm

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01265251 completednot on this map

Evaluation of a Computerised Neuropsychological Test Battery for Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (INPH)

TypeobservationalSponsorUmeå UniversityRan2007 to 2010Enrolled97ConditionsNormal Pressure HydrocephalusArmsComputerized neuropsychological test, Conventional neuropsychological test
NCT05604183 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Hyperspectral Retinal Observations for the Cross-sectional Detection of Alzheimer's Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorMantis Photonics ABRan2022 to 2023Enrolled80ConditionsAlzheimer Disease, Early Onset, Cognitive Impairment, Cognitive DeclineArmsnon-invasive hyperspectral retinoscopy, blood sample, Test of cognitive ability on tablet computer with CoGNIT software
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anders BehrensBlekinge Centre of Competence, Blekinge Hospital Karlskrona, Karlskrona, Sweden ; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Anders EklundCentre for Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden ; Department of Radiation Science, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Eva ElghDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Psychiatry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Cynthia SmithThe Sandra and Malcolm Berman Brain & Spine Institute, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA ; Division of Neuropsychology, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Michael A WilliamsThe Sandra and Malcolm Berman Brain & Spine Institute, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA ; Adult Hydrocephalus Center, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA ; Department of Neurology, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jan MalmDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Umeå University · SESinai Hospital · USRegion Blekinge · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA tool for standardized and repeated neuropsychological assessments in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) is needed. The objective of this study was to develop a computerized neuropsychological test battery designed for INPH and to evaluate its reliability, validity and patient's ability to complete the tests.

methodsBased on a structured review of the literature on neuropsychological testing in INPH, the eight tests most sensitive to the INPH cognitive profile were implemented in a computerized format. The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) was also included. Tests were presented on a touch-screen monitor, with animated instructions and speaker sound. The battery was evaluated with the following cohorts: A. Test-retest reliability, 44 healthy elderly; B. Validity against standard pen and pencil testing, 28 patients with various cognitive impairments; C. Ability to complete test battery, defined as completion of at least seven of the eight tests, 40 investigated for INPH.

resultsA. All except the figure copy test showed good test-retest reliability, r = 0.67-0.90; B. A high correlation was seen between conventional and computerized tests (r = 0.66-0.85) except for delayed recognition and figure copy task; C. Seventy-eight percent completed the computerized battery; Patients diagnosed with INPH (n = 26) performed worse on all tests, including depression score, compared to healthy controls.

conclusionsA new computerized neuropsychological test battery designed for patients with communicating hydrocephalus and INPH was introduced. Its reliability, validity for general cognitive impairment and completion rate for INPH was promising. After exclusion of the figure copy task, the battery is ready for clinical evaluation and as a next step we suggest validation for INPH and a comparison before and after shunt surgery.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.org NCT01265251.

Indexed as

DementiaHydrocephalus, Normal pressureNeuropsychological testsNeuropsychologyReliability and validitySoftware

Identifiers

PMID25279138
PMCPMC4181752
OpenAlexW2121574365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.