Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25279066›Full record

ArticleMalaysian orthopaedic journal2012

Clubfoot: the treatment outcome using quantitative assessment of deformity.

Ah Rasit, Ah Rasit, H Azani, Pa Zabidah, A Merikan, Ba Nur Alyana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaysian orthopaedic journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ah RasitDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kuching, Malaysia.
Ah RasitDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kuching, Malaysia.
H AzaniDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kuching, Malaysia.
Pa ZabidahDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kuching, Malaysia.
A MerikanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kuching, Malaysia.
Ba Nur AlyanaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kuching, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstract

introductionThe recent trend in management of congenital idiopathic clubfoot tends towards conservative treatment. This study reviews the outcomes of treatment in our practice using the quantitative clubfoot assessment of the deformity (QCAD).

methodsThirty patients (38 cases of clubfoot) with congenital idiopathic clubfoot treated at Sarawak General Hospital were followed-up for a mean of 3.6 years. The quantitative assessment consists of limb anthropometric measurement and the Pirani deformity severity score.

resultsThere were 15 boys and 15 girls, with a mean age of 4.4 years (range, 13m - 8y). Most patients were of the Malay race (67%), followed by Chinese (23%) and others (10%). Eight patients suffered from bilateral congenital idiopathic clubfoot (33%), 12 were left unilateral (40%) and 10 were right unilateral (27%). Out of the total of 30 patients, 12 were treated conservatively with serial casting and 18 patients were treated surgically after resistance to serial casting at the age of nine months. At follow-up, there were significant differences between the surgical group (2.57 ± 1.45); (0.86 ± 0.36) and conservative group (0.7 ± 0.81); (0.34 ± 0.35) respectively (p < 0.05) regarding the mean difference in mid-leg circumference and foot length discrepancy in patients with unilateral clubfoot. There were no significant difference noted between groups with regards to results of the Pirani score, leg length discrepancy and mean difference of mid-foot circumference.

conclusionThere were significant differences in calf atrophy and foot length discrepancy when comparing surgically treated clubfoot patient compared to conservatively treated patients. Conservative treatment of clubfoot is the preferred method of treatment while surgical treatment may be necessary in more resistant cases. KEY WORDS: Clubfoot, outcome, treatment, quantitative assessment, deformity.

Identifiers

PMID25279066
PMCPMC4093617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.