Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25279001›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2014

The genetic interacting landscape of 63 candidate genes in Major Depressive Disorder: an explorative study.

Magnus Lekman, Ola Hössjer, Peter Andrews, Henrik Källberg, Daniel Uvehag, Dennis Charney, Husseini Manji, John A Rush, Francis J McMahon, Jason H Moore and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genome-wide gene-environment interaction in depression: A systematic evaluation of candidate genes: The childhood trauma working-group of PGC-MDD.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Magnus LekmanDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Neuroimmunology Unit, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ola HössjerDepartment of Mathematics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Peter AndrewsInstitute of Quantitative Biomedical Science, Department of Genetics and Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Henrik KällbergInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Daniel UvehagDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Neuroimmunology Unit, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Dennis CharneyDepartment of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Husseini ManjiLaboratory of Molecular Pathophysiology, NIMH, NIH, Department of Health & Human Services (DHHS), Bethesda, USA.
John A RushAcademic Medical Research Institute, Duke-National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Francis J McMahonGenetic Basis of Mood & Anxiety Disorders Section, Human Genetic Branch, NIMH, NIH, Department of Health & Human Services (DHHS), Bethesda, USA.
Jason H MooreInstitute of Quantitative Biomedical Science, Department of Genetics and Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Ingrid KockumDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Neuroimmunology Unit, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEDartmouth College · USUnited States Department of Health and Human Services · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USNational University of Singapore · SGStockholm University · SE

Funding

Genetic Determinants of Antidepressant Response in the STAR*D CohortZIAMH002844 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI MCMAHON, FRANCIS J · 2009 to 2025
$11.1M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenetic contributions to major depressive disorder (MDD) are thought to result from multiple genes interacting with each other. Different procedures have been proposed to detect such interactions. Which approach is best for explaining the risk of developing disease is unclear. This study sought to elucidate the genetic interaction landscape in candidate genes for MDD by conducting a SNP-SNP interaction analysis using an exhaustive search through 3,704 SNP-markers in 1,732 cases and 1,783 controls provided from the GAIN MDD study. We used three different methods to detect interactions, two logistic regressions models (multiplicative and additive) and one data mining and machine learning (MDR) approach.

resultsAlthough none of the interaction survived correction for multiple comparisons, the results provide important information for future genetic interaction studies in complex disorders. Among the 0.5% most significant observations, none had been reported previously for risk to MDD. Within this group of interactions, less than 0.03% would have been detectable based on main effect approach or an a priori algorithm. We evaluated correlations among the three different models and conclude that all three algorithms detected the same interactions to a low degree. Although the top interactions had a surprisingly large effect size for MDD (e.g. additive dominant model Puncorrected = 9.10E-9 with attributable proportion (AP) value = 0.58 and multiplicative recessive model with Puncorrected = 6.95E-5 with odds ratio (OR estimated from β3) value = 4.99) the area under the curve (AUC) estimates were low (< 0.54). Moreover, the population attributable fraction (PAF) estimates were also low (< 0.15).

conclusionsWe conclude that the top interactions on their own did not explain much of the genetic variance of MDD. The different statistical interaction methods we used in the present study did not identify the same pairs of interacting markers. Genetic interaction studies may uncover previously unsuspected effects that could provide novel insights into MDD risk, but much larger sample sizes are needed before this strategy can be powerfully applied.

Indexed as

Additive interactionData mining and machine learningLogistic regressionMajor depressive disorderMultiplicative interaction

Identifiers

PMID25279001
PMCPMC4181757
OpenAlexW2152790001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.