Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25278951›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2014

Silicon, endophytes and secondary metabolites as grass defenses against mammalian herbivores.

Otso Huitu, Kristian M Forbes, Marjo Helander, Riitta Julkunen-Tiitto, Xavier Lambin, Kari Saikkonen, Peter Stuart, Sini Sulkama, Sue Hartley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Insect oviposition preference betweenEcology and evolution · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Phytolith Formation in Plants: From Soil to Cell.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Otso HuituSuonenjoki Research Unit, Finnish Forest Research Institute Suonenjoki, Finland.
Kristian M ForbesSuonenjoki Research Unit, Finnish Forest Research Institute Suonenjoki, Finland.
Marjo HelanderSection of Ecology, University of Turku Turku, Finland.
Riitta Julkunen-TiittoDepartment of Biology, University of Eastern Finland Joensuu, Finland.
Xavier LambinSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen Aberdeen, UK.
Kari SaikkonenPlant Protection, Agrifood Research Finland Jokioinen, Finland.
Peter StuartSuonenjoki Research Unit, Finnish Forest Research Institute Suonenjoki, Finland.
Sini SulkamaSuonenjoki Research Unit, Finnish Forest Research Institute Suonenjoki, Finland.
Sue HartleyDepartment of Biology, University of York York, UK.
Agrifood Research Finland · FIUniversity of Eastern Finland · FIUniversity of Turku · FIUniversity of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grasses have been considered to primarily employ tolerance in lieu of defense in mitigating damage caused by herbivory. Yet a number of mechanisms have been identified in grasses, which may deter feeding by grazers. These include enhanced silicon uptake, hosting of toxin-producing endophytic fungi and induction of secondary metabolites. While these mechanisms have been individually studied, their synergistic responses to grazing, as well as their effects on grazers, are poorly known. A field experiment was carried out in 5 × 5 m outdoor enclosures to quantify phytochemical changes of either endophyte-infected (E+) or endophyte-free (E-) meadow fescue (Schedonorus pratensis) in response to medium intensity (corresponding with densities of ca. 1200 voles/ha for 5 weeks during 3 months) or heavy intensity (ca. 1200 voles/ha for 8 weeks during 3 months) grazing by a mammalian herbivore, the field vole (Microtus agrestis). A laboratory experiment was then conducted to evaluate the effects of endophyte infection status and grazing history of the grass diet on vole performance. As predicted, grazing increased foliar silicon content, by up to 13%. Grazing also increased foliar levels of phosphorous and several phenolic compounds, most notably those of the flavonols isorhamnetin-diglycoside and rhamnetin derivative. Silicon concentrations were consistently circa 16% higher in E+ grasses than in E-grasses, at all levels of grazing. Similarly, concentrations of chlorogenic acid derivative were found to be consistently higher in E+ than in E- grasses. Female voles maintained on heavily grazed grasses suffered higher mortality rates in the laboratory than female voles fed ungrazed grass, regardless of endophyte infection status. Our results conclusively demonstrate that, in addition to tolerance, grasses employ multi-tiered, effective defenses against mammalian grazers.

Indexed as

defenseendophytesgrassesgrazingphenolicssecondary metabolitessiliconvoles

Identifiers

PMID25278951
PMCPMC4166226
OpenAlexW2129822586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.