ArticleFrontiers in plant science2014
Belowground plant development measured with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): exploiting the potential for non-invasive trait quantification using sugar beet as a proxy.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Root system architecture and drought adaptation: emerging tools and genetic insights.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Next-generation translational genomics for developing future crops.Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Review
- Syndrome "basses richesses" disease induced structural deformations and sectorial distribution of photoassimilates in sugar beet taproot revealed by combined MRI-PET imaging.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Metabolic imaging in living plants: A promising field for chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI.Science advances · 2024Article
- Understanding role of roots in plant response to drought: Way forward to climate-resilient crops.The plant genome · 2024Review
- Plant Nutrition-New Methods Based on the Lessons of History: A Review.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- 3D U-Net Segmentation Improves Root System Reconstruction from 3D MRI Images in Automated and Manual Virtual Reality Work Flows.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2023Article
- Proximal and remote sensing in plant phenomics: 20 years of progress, challenges, and perspectives.Plant communications · 2022Review
- Rice immediately adapts the dynamics of photosynthates translocation to roots in response to changes in soil water environment.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Recent advances in methods forPeerJ · 2022Review
- Cold-Triggered Induction of ROS- and Raffinose Metabolism in Freezing-Sensitive Taproot Tissue of Sugar Beet.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Specialized Plant Growth Chamber Designs to Study Complex Rhizosphere Interactions.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
- Article
- Magnetic Resonance Microscopy at Cellular Resolution and Localised Spectroscopy of Medicago truncatula at 22.3 Tesla.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- The biochemistry underpinning industrial seed technology and mechanical processing of sugar beet.Planta · 2019Article
- Uncovering the hidden half of plants using new advances in root phenotyping.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2019Review
- New live screening of plant-nematode interactions in the rhizosphere.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Investigating the microstructure of plant leaves in 3D with lab-based X-ray computed tomography.Plant methods · 2018Article
- Macro optical projection tomography for large scale 3D imaging of plant structures and gene activity.Journal of experimental botany · 2017Article
- Effects of Secondary Plant Metabolites on Microbial Populations: Changes in Community Structure and Metabolic Activity in Contaminated Environments.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Both structural and functional properties of belowground plant organs are critical for the development and yield of plants but, compared to the shoot, much more difficult to observe due to soil opacity. Many processes concerning the belowground plant performance are not fully understood, in particular spatial and temporal dynamics and their interrelation with environmental factors. We used Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) as a noninvasive method to evaluate which traits can be measured when a complex plant organ is monitored in-vivo while growing in the soil. We chose sugar beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. vulgaris) as a model system. The beet consists mainly of root tissues, is rather complex regarding tissue structure and responses to environmental factors, and thereby a good object to test the applicability of MRI for 3D phenotyping approaches. Over a time period of up to 3 months, traits such as beet morphology or anatomy were followed in the soil and the effect of differently sized pots on beet fresh weight calculated from MRI data was studied. There was a clear positive correlation between the pot size and the increase in fresh weight of a sugar beet over time. Since knowledge of the development of internal beet structures with several concentric cambia, vascular and parenchyma rings is still limited, we consecutively acquired 3D volumetric images on individual plants using the MRI contrast parameter T2 to map the development of rings at the tissue level. This demonstrates that MRI provides versatile protocols to non-invasively measure plant traits in the soil. It opens new avenues to investigate belowground plant performance under adverse environmental conditions such as drought, nutrient shortage, or soil compaction to seek for traits of belowground organs making plants more resilient to stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.