Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25278943›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2014

Transcriptional and metabolic signatures of Arabidopsis responses to chewing damage by an insect herbivore and bacterial infection and the consequences of their interaction.

Heidi M Appel, Shahina B Maqbool, Surabhi Raina, Guru Jagadeeswaran, Biswa R Acharya, John C Hanley, Kathryn P Miller, Leonard Hearnes, A Daniel Jones, Ramesh Raina and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. ArabidopsisFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Heidi M AppelPlant Sciences, Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri Columbia, MO, USA.
Shahina B MaqboolDepartment of Biology, Syracuse University Syracuse, NY, USA ; Department of Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine Bronx, NY, USA.
Surabhi RainaDepartment of Biology, Syracuse University Syracuse, NY, USA.
Guru JagadeeswaranDepartment of Biology, Syracuse University Syracuse, NY, USA ; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oklahoma State University - Stillwater Stillwater, OK, USA.
Biswa R AcharyaDepartment of Biology, Syracuse University Syracuse, NY, USA ; Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University University Park, State College, PA, USA.
John C HanleyDepartment of Chemistry, Pennsylvania State University University Park, State College, PA, USA ; Allergan, Inc. Irvine, CA, USA.
Kathryn P MillerDepartment of Pediatrics, Nemours/AI duPont Hospital for Children Wilmington, DE, USA.
Leonard HearnesDepartment of Statistics, University of Missouri Columbia, MO, USA.
A Daniel JonesDepartments of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Chemistry, Michigan State University East Lansing, MI, USA.
Ramesh RainaDepartment of Biology, Syracuse University Syracuse, NY, USA.
Jack C SchultzPlant Sciences, Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri Columbia, MO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants use multiple interacting signaling systems to identify and respond to biotic stresses. Although it is often assumed that there is specificity in signaling responses to specific pests, this is rarely examined outside of the gene-for-gene relationships of plant-pathogen interactions. In this study, we first compared early events in gene expression and later events in metabolite profiles of Arabidopsis thaliana following attack by either the caterpillar Spodoptera exigua or avirulent (DC3000 avrRpm1) Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato at three time points. Transcriptional responses of the plant to caterpillar feeding were rapid, occurring within 1 h of feeding, and then decreased at 6 and 24 h. In contrast, plant response to the pathogen was undetectable at 1 h but grew larger and more significant at 6 and 24 h. There was a surprisingly large amount of overlap in jasmonate and salicylate signaling in responses to the insect and pathogen, including levels of gene expression and individual hormones. The caterpillar and pathogen treatments induced different patterns of expression of glucosinolate biosynthesis genes and levels of glucosinolates. This suggests that when specific responses develop, their regulation is complex and best understood by characterizing expression of many genes and metabolites. We then examined the effect of feeding by the caterpillar Spodoptera exigua on Arabidopsis susceptibility to virulent (DC3000) and avirulent (DC3000 avrRpm1) P. syringae pv. tomato, and found that caterpillar feeding enhanced Arabidopsis resistance to the avirulent pathogen and lowered resistance to the virulent strain. We conclude that efforts to improve plant resistance to bacterial pathogens are likely to influence resistance to insects and vice versa. Studies explicitly comparing plant responses to multiple stresses, including the role of elicitors at early time points, are critical to understanding how plants organize responses in natural settings.

Indexed as

Arabidopsis thalianaglucosinolatesherbivoryhormone signalingPseudomonas syringaeSpodoptera exigua

Identifiers

PMID25278943
PMCPMC4166115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.