Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25278931›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2014

Behavioral models of tinnitus and hyperacusis in animals.

Sarah H Hayes, Kelly E Radziwon, Daniel J Stolzberg, Richard J Salvi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Animal Models of Tinnitus: A Review.Otolaryngologic clinics of North America · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Inhibition of Experimental Tinnitus With High Frequency Stimulation of the Rat Medial Geniculate Body.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah H HayesCenter for Hearing and Deafness, Department of Communicative Disorders and Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York , Buffalo, NY , USA.
Kelly E RadziwonCenter for Hearing and Deafness, Department of Communicative Disorders and Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York , Buffalo, NY , USA.
Daniel J StolzbergDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario , London, ON , Canada.
Richard J SalviCenter for Hearing and Deafness, Department of Communicative Disorders and Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York , Buffalo, NY , USA.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USWestern University · CA

Funding

Blast Wave Effects: Hearing, Memory, TherapyR01DC011808 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI SALVI, RICHARD J · 2012 to 2016
$2.0M
Neural Aspects of TinnitusR01DC009219 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI SALVI, RICHARD J · 2008 to 2012
$1.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009219NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phantom perception of tinnitus and reduced sound-level tolerance associated with hyperacusis have a high comorbidity and can be debilitating conditions for which there are no widely accepted treatments. One factor limiting the development of treatments for tinnitus and hyperacusis is the lack of reliable animal behavioral models of these disorders. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to highlight the current animal models of tinnitus and hyperacusis, and to detail the advantages and disadvantages of each paradigm. To date, this is the first review to include models of both tinnitus and hyperacusis.

Indexed as

behaviorhyperacusislick suppressionoperant conditioningreaction timestartle reflextinnitus

Identifiers

PMID25278931
PMCPMC4166233
OpenAlexW1973085419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.