Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25278929›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2014

Rhythm perception, production, and synchronization during the perinatal period.

Joëlle Provasi, David I Anderson, Marianne Barbu-Roth

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Critical Review on the Development and Evolution of Beat Perception.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Effects of Maternal Heartbeat Exposure on Neonatal Autonomic Regulation.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Contingent mother's voice intervention facilitates attention in hospitalized preterm infants with neural insults.Mind, brain and education : the official journal of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Joëlle ProvasiLaboratoire Cognition Humaine et Artificielle, Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes Paris, France.
David I AndersonDepartment of Kinesiology, San Francisco State University San Francisco, CA, USA ; Institute of Human Development, University of California at Berkeley Berkeley, CA, USA.
Marianne Barbu-RothLaboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Université Paris Descartes - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Paris, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Sqt1p, important regulator of the kinetochore complexesP20MD000262 · NIMHD · SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CORRIGAN, ROBERT · 2002 to 2006
$5.0M
Vision and Locomotion in InfantsR03HD050638 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI ANDERSON, DAVID I · 2005 to 2006
$138k
NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD050638NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD000262
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensori-motor synchronization (SMS) is the coordination of rhythmic movement with an external rhythm. It plays a central role in motor, cognitive, and social behavior. SMS is commonly studied in adults and in children from four years of age onward. Prior to this age, the ability has rarely been investigated due to a lack of available methods. The present paper reviews what is known about SMS in young children, infants, newborns, and fetuses. The review highlights fetal and infant perception of rhythm and cross modal perception of rhythm, fetal, and infant production of rhythm and cross modal production of rhythm, and the contexts in which production of rhythm can be observed in infants. A primary question is whether infants, even newborns, can modify their spontaneous rhythmical motor behavior in response to external rhythmical stimulation. Spontaneous sucking, crying, and leg movements have been studied in the presence or absence of rhythmical auditory stimulation. Findings suggest that the interaction between movement and sound is present at birth and that SMS can be observed in special conditions and within a narrow range of tempi, particularly near the infant's own spontaneous motor tempo. The discussion centers on the fundamental role of SMS in interaction and communication at the beginning of life.

Indexed as

infantsrhythmsensorimotor synchronizationsynchrony

Identifiers

PMID25278929
PMCPMC4166894
OpenAlexW2037081780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.