Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25278869›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2014

Self-consistent determination of the spike-train power spectrum in a neural network with sparse connectivity.

Benjamin Dummer, Stefan Wieland, Benjamin Lindner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Spike Spectra for Recurrences.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  4. Recurrence-mediated suprathreshold stochastic resonance.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Striatal network modeling in Huntington's Disease.PLoS computational biology · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin DummerTheory of Complex Systems and Neurophysics, Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin, Germany ; Department of Physics, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin Berlin, Germany.
Stefan WielandTheory of Complex Systems and Neurophysics, Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin, Germany ; Department of Physics, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin Berlin, Germany.
Benjamin LindnerTheory of Complex Systems and Neurophysics, Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin, Germany ; Department of Physics, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin Berlin, Germany.
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major source of random variability in cortical networks is the quasi-random arrival of presynaptic action potentials from many other cells. In network studies as well as in the study of the response properties of single cells embedded in a network, synaptic background input is often approximated by Poissonian spike trains. However, the output statistics of the cells is in most cases far from being Poisson. This is inconsistent with the assumption of similar spike-train statistics for pre- and postsynaptic cells in a recurrent network. Here we tackle this problem for the popular class of integrate-and-fire neurons and study a self-consistent statistics of input and output spectra of neural spike trains. Instead of actually using a large network, we use an iterative scheme, in which we simulate a single neuron over several generations. In each of these generations, the neuron is stimulated with surrogate stochastic input that has a similar statistics as the output of the previous generation. For the surrogate input, we employ two distinct approximations: (i) a superposition of renewal spike trains with the same interspike interval density as observed in the previous generation and (ii) a Gaussian current with a power spectrum proportional to that observed in the previous generation. For input parameters that correspond to balanced input in the network, both the renewal and the Gaussian iteration procedure converge quickly and yield comparable results for the self-consistent spike-train power spectrum. We compare our results to large-scale simulations of a random sparsely connected network of leaky integrate-and-fire neurons (Brunel, 2000) and show that in the asynchronous regime close to a state of balanced synaptic input from the network, our iterative schemes provide an excellent approximations to the autocorrelation of spike trains in the recurrent network.

Indexed as

neural noisenon-Poissonian spikingrecurrent neural networksspike-train power spectrumspike-train statistics

Identifiers

PMID25278869
PMCPMC4166962
OpenAlexW1971123606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.