Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25278757›Full record

ArticlePalliative care2013

Program assessment framework for a rural palliative supportive service.

Barbara Pesut, Brenda Hooper, Richard Sawatzky, Carole A Robinson, Joan L Bottorff, Miranda Dalhuisen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative care, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Barbara PesutSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Brenda HooperSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada. ; Coordinator, Rural Palliative Supportive Service, British Columbia, Canada.
Richard SawatzkySchool of Nursing, Trinity Western University, Langley, British Columbia, Canada. ; Centre for Health Outcomes and Evaluation Sciences, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Carole A RobinsonSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Joan L BottorffSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Miranda DalhuisenSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although there are a number of quality frameworks available for evaluating palliative services, it is necessary to adapt these frameworks to models of care designed for the rural context. The purpose of this paper was to describe the development of a program assessment framework for evaluating a rural palliative supportive service as part of a community-based research project designed to enhance the quality of care for patients and families living with life-limiting chronic illness. A review of key documents from electronic databases and grey literature resulted in the identification of general principles for high-quality palliative care in rural contexts. These principles were then adapted to provide an assessment framework for the evaluation of the rural palliative supportive service. This framework was evaluated and refined using a community-based advisory committee guiding the development of the service. The resulting program assessment framework includes 48 criteria organized under seven themes: embedded within community; palliative care is timely, comprehensive, and continuous; access to palliative care education and experts; effective teamwork and communication; family partnerships; policies and services that support rural capacity and values; and systematic approach for measuring and improving outcomes of care. It is important to identify essential elements for assessing the quality of services designed to improve rural palliative care, taking into account the strengths of rural communities and addressing common challenges. The program assessment framework has potential to increase the likelihood of desired outcomes in palliative care provisions in rural settings and requires further validation.

Indexed as

quality indicatorsquality of carerural palliative care

Identifiers

PMID25278757
PMCPMC4147755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.