Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25278704›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2014

Xiaotan Sanjie decoction attenuates tumor angiogenesis by manipulating Notch-1-regulated proliferation of gastric cancer stem-like cells.

Bing Yan, Long Liu, Ying Zhao, Li-Juan Xiu, Da-Zhi Sun, Xuan Liu, Ye Lu, Jun Shi, Yin-Cheng Zhang, Yong-Jin Li and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Inhibitory Effect ofBioMed research international · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bing YanBing Yan, Ying Zhao, Li-Juan Xiu, Da-Zhi Sun, Xuan Liu, Ye Lu, Jun Shi, Yin-Cheng Zhang, Yong-Jin Li, Xiao-Wei Wang, Yu-Qi Zhou, Shou-Han Feng, Can Lv, Pin-Kang Wei, Zhi-Feng Qin, Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changzheng Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.
Long LiuBing Yan, Ying Zhao, Li-Juan Xiu, Da-Zhi Sun, Xuan Liu, Ye Lu, Jun Shi, Yin-Cheng Zhang, Yong-Jin Li, Xiao-Wei Wang, Yu-Qi Zhou, Shou-Han Feng, Can Lv, Pin-Kang Wei, Zhi-Feng Qin, Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changzheng Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.
Ying ZhaoBing Yan, Ying Zhao, Li-Juan Xiu, Da-Zhi Sun, Xuan Liu, Ye Lu, Jun Shi, Yin-Cheng Zhang, Yong-Jin Li, Xiao-Wei Wang, Yu-Qi Zhou, Shou-Han Feng, Can Lv, Pin-Kang Wei, Zhi-Feng Qin, Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changzheng Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.
Li-Juan XiuBing Yan, Ying Zhao, Li-Juan Xiu, Da-Zhi Sun, Xuan Liu, Ye Lu, Jun Shi, Yin-Cheng Zhang, Yong-Jin Li, Xiao-Wei Wang, Yu-Qi Zhou, Shou-Han Feng, Can Lv, Pin-Kang Wei, Zhi-Feng Qin, Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changzheng Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.
Da-Zhi SunBing Yan, Ying Zhao, Li-Juan Xiu, Da-Zhi Sun, Xuan Liu, Ye Lu, Jun Shi, Yin-Cheng Zhang, Yong-Jin Li, Xiao-Wei Wang, Yu-Qi Zhou, Shou-Han Feng, Can Lv, Pin-Kang Wei, Zhi-Feng Qin, Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changzheng Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.
Xuan LiuBing Yan, Ying Zhao, Li-Juan Xiu, Da-Zhi Sun, Xuan Liu, Ye Lu, Jun Shi, Yin-Cheng Zhang, Yong-Jin Li, Xiao-Wei Wang, Yu-Qi Zhou, Shou-Han Feng, Can Lv, Pin-Kang Wei, Zhi-Feng Qin, Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changzheng Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.
Ye LuBing Yan, Ying Zhao, Li-Juan Xiu, Da-Zhi Sun, Xuan Liu, Ye Lu, Jun Shi, Yin-Cheng Zhang, Yong-Jin Li, Xiao-Wei Wang, Yu-Qi Zhou, Shou-Han Feng, Can Lv, Pin-Kang Wei, Zhi-Feng Qin, Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changzheng Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.
Jun ShiBing Yan, Ying Zhao, Li-Juan Xiu, Da-Zhi Sun, Xuan Liu, Ye Lu, Jun Shi, Yin-Cheng Zhang, Yong-Jin Li, Xiao-Wei Wang, Yu-Qi Zhou, Shou-Han Feng, Can Lv, Pin-Kang Wei, Zhi-Feng Qin, Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changzheng Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.
Yin-Cheng ZhangBing Yan, Ying Zhao, Li-Juan Xiu, Da-Zhi Sun, Xuan Liu, Ye Lu, Jun Shi, Yin-Cheng Zhang, Yong-Jin Li, Xiao-Wei Wang, Yu-Qi Zhou, Shou-Han Feng, Can Lv, Pin-Kang Wei, Zhi-Feng Qin, Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changzheng Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.
Yong-Jin LiBing Yan, Ying Zhao, Li-Juan Xiu, Da-Zhi Sun, Xuan Liu, Ye Lu, Jun Shi, Yin-Cheng Zhang, Yong-Jin Li, Xiao-Wei Wang, Yu-Qi Zhou, Shou-Han Feng, Can Lv, Pin-Kang Wei, Zhi-Feng Qin, Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changzheng Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.
Xiao-Wei WangBing Yan, Ying Zhao, Li-Juan Xiu, Da-Zhi Sun, Xuan Liu, Ye Lu, Jun Shi, Yin-Cheng Zhang, Yong-Jin Li, Xiao-Wei Wang, Yu-Qi Zhou, Shou-Han Feng, Can Lv, Pin-Kang Wei, Zhi-Feng Qin, Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changzheng Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.
Yu-Qi ZhouBing Yan, Ying Zhao, Li-Juan Xiu, Da-Zhi Sun, Xuan Liu, Ye Lu, Jun Shi, Yin-Cheng Zhang, Yong-Jin Li, Xiao-Wei Wang, Yu-Qi Zhou, Shou-Han Feng, Can Lv, Pin-Kang Wei, Zhi-Feng Qin, Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changzheng Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.
Shou-Han FengBing Yan, Ying Zhao, Li-Juan Xiu, Da-Zhi Sun, Xuan Liu, Ye Lu, Jun Shi, Yin-Cheng Zhang, Yong-Jin Li, Xiao-Wei Wang, Yu-Qi Zhou, Shou-Han Feng, Can Lv, Pin-Kang Wei, Zhi-Feng Qin, Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changzheng Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.
Can LvBing Yan, Ying Zhao, Li-Juan Xiu, Da-Zhi Sun, Xuan Liu, Ye Lu, Jun Shi, Yin-Cheng Zhang, Yong-Jin Li, Xiao-Wei Wang, Yu-Qi Zhou, Shou-Han Feng, Can Lv, Pin-Kang Wei, Zhi-Feng Qin, Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changzheng Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.
Pin-Kang WeiBing Yan, Ying Zhao, Li-Juan Xiu, Da-Zhi Sun, Xuan Liu, Ye Lu, Jun Shi, Yin-Cheng Zhang, Yong-Jin Li, Xiao-Wei Wang, Yu-Qi Zhou, Shou-Han Feng, Can Lv, Pin-Kang Wei, Zhi-Feng Qin, Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changzheng Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.
Zhi-Feng QinBing Yan, Ying Zhao, Li-Juan Xiu, Da-Zhi Sun, Xuan Liu, Ye Lu, Jun Shi, Yin-Cheng Zhang, Yong-Jin Li, Xiao-Wei Wang, Yu-Qi Zhou, Shou-Han Feng, Can Lv, Pin-Kang Wei, Zhi-Feng Qin, Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changzheng Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.
Second Military Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo determine the underlying mechanisms of action and influence of Xiaotan Sanjie (XTSJ) decoction on gastric cancer stem-like cells (GCSCs).

methodsThe gastric cancer cell line MKN-45 line was selected and sorted by FACS using the cancer stem cell marker CD44; the stemness of these cells was checked in our previous study. In an in vitro study, the expression of Notch-1, Hes1, Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and Ki-67 in both CD44-positive gastric cancer stem-like cells (GCSCs) and CD44-negative cells was measured by Western blot. The effect of XTSJ serum on cell viability and on the above markers was measured by MTT assay and Western blot, respectively. In an in vivo study, the ability to induce angiogenesis and maintenance of GCSCs in CD44-positive-MKN-45- and CD44-negative-engrafted mice were detected by immunohistochemical staining using markers for CD34 and CD44, respectively. The role of XTSJ decoction in regulating the expression of Notch-1, Hes1, VEGF and Ki-67 was measured by Western blot and real-time polymerase chain reaction.

resultsCD44(+) GCSCs showed more cell proliferation and VEGF secretion than CD44-negative cells in vitro, which were accompanied by the high expression of Notch-1 and Hes1 and positively associated with tumor growth (GCSCs vs CD44-negative cells, 2.72 ± 0.25 vs 1.46 ± 0.16, P < 0.05) and microvessel density (MVD) (GCSCs vs CD44-negative cells, 8.15 ± 0.42 vs 3.83 ± 0.49, P < 0.001) in vivo. XTSJ decoction inhibited the viability of both cell types in a dose-dependent manner in vitro. Specifically, a significant difference in the medium- (82.87% ± 6.53%) and high-dose XTSJ groups (77.43% ± 7.34%) was detected at 24 h in the CD44(+) GCSCs group compared with the saline group (95.42% ± 5.76%) and the low-dose XTSJ group (90.74% ± 6.57%) (P < 0.05). However, the efficacy of XTSJ decoction was reduced in the CD44(-) groups; significant differences were only detected in the high-dose XTSJ group at 48 h (78.57% ± 6.94%) and 72 h (72.12% ± 7.68%) when compared with the other CD44- groups (P < 0.05). Notably, these differences were highly consistent with the Notch-1, Hes1, VEGF and Ki-67 expression in these cells. Similarly, in vivo, XTSJ decoction inhibited tumor growth in a dose-dependent manner. A significant difference was observed in the medium- (1.76 ± 0.15) and high-dose XTSJ (1.33 ± 0.081) groups compared with the GCSCs control group (2.72 ± 0.25) and the low-dose XTSJ group (2.51 ± 0.25) (P < 0.05). We also detected a remarkable decrease of MVD in the medium- (7.10 ± 0.60) and high-dose XTSJ (5.99 ± 0.47) groups compared with the GCSC control group (8.15 ± 0.42) and the low-dose XTSJ group (8.14 ± 0.46) (P < 0.05). Additionally, CD44 expression was decreased in these groups [medium- (4.43 ± 0.45) and high-dose XTSJ groups (3.56 ± 0.31) vs the GCSC control (5.96 ± 0.46) and low dose XTSJ groups (5.91 ± 0.38)] (P < 0.05). The significant differences in Notch-1, Hes1, VEGF and Ki-67 expression highly mirrored the results of XTSJ decoction in inhibiting tumor growth, MVD and CD44 expression.

conclusionNotch-1 may play an important role in regulating the proliferation of GCSCs; XTSJ decoction could attenuate tumor angiogenesis, at least partially, by inhibiting Notch-1.

Indexed as

Neovascularization, PathologicAngiogenesis InhibitorsAnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrugs, Chinese HerbalGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHomeodomain ProteinsHumansHyaluronan ReceptorsKi-67 AntigenMaleMice, NudeAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsCD44 protein, humanDrugs, Chinese HerbalHES1 protein, humanHomeodomain ProteinsHyaluronan ReceptorsKi-67 AntigenNOTCH1 protein, humanReceptor, Notch1Transcription Factor HES-1Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, humanxiaotan sanjieGastric cancer stem-like cellsNotch-1Tumor angiogenesisVascular endothelial growth factorXiaotan Sanjie decoction

Identifiers

PMID25278704
PMCPMC4177489
OpenAlexW2091753918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.