Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25278630›Full record

ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2014

"Pregnant and Operating": Evaluation of a Germany-wide Survey Among Female Gynaecologists and Surgeons.

C Knieper, B Ramsauer, K Hancke, A Woeckel, L Ismail, A Bühren, B Toth

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. To Be a Pregnant Surgeon-Is There Anything to Be Afraid of?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  8. Pregnancy in physicians: A scoping review.American journal of surgery · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Work-Related Factors and Pregnancy Outcomes in Female Surgeons.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

C KnieperGynecological Endocrinology and Fertility Disorders, Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, Heidelberg.
B RamsauerVivantes Hospital Neukölln, Berlin.
K HanckeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Ulm.
A WoeckelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Julius Maximilians University Würzburg, Würzburg.
L IsmailGynecological Endocrinology and Fertility Disorders, Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, Heidelberg.
A BührenMedical Practice for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Murnau.
B TothGynecological Endocrinology and Fertility Disorders, Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, Heidelberg.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DEVivantes Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current law on the protection of expectant and nursing mothers largely rules out surgical activities during pregnancy for female doctors who perform surgical roles in hospitals. The proportion of female junior staff in gynaecology amounts to 80 %, and, for many of these women, surgical further training is not possible following official notification of an existing pregnancy. In a Germany-wide survey of female gynaecologists and surgeons using a questionnaire, it was determined to what extent female doctors worked in surgery during pregnancy, whether it led to complications in the pregnancy, when the employer was notified about the pregnancy, and what desire for change there is with regard to the law on the protection of expectant and nursing mothers. The data from 164 female doctors, of which 136 are gynaecologists and 28 surgeons, was evaluated. On average, the pregnancy was announced during the 14th week of pregnancy (WOP), and the doctor was not allowed to perform surgical activities in the 21st WOP. Female doctors in higher professional roles tended to announce the pregnancy later and ended their surgical activities later. There was no link between the time of ceasing surgical activities and an increased occurrence of complaints or complications during the pregnancy. In total, only 53 % of respondents had an appraisal during pregnancy and 75 % wanted a change in the law on the protection of expectant and nursing mothers.

Indexed as

operatingpregnancyprotection of expectant and nursing mothers

Identifiers

PMID25278630
PMCPMC4175126
OpenAlexW2334171785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.