Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25278620›Full record

ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2012

Transvaginal Ultrasound for Endometrial Carcinoma Screening - Current Evidence-based Data.

E Steiner, I Juhasz-Bösz, G Emons, H Kölbl, R Kimmig, P Mallmann, für die AGO Uterus der DGGG

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

E SteinerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, GPR Clinical Centre Ruesselsheim.
I Juhasz-BöszDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Saarland.
G EmonsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Georg-August-University of Goettingen.
H KölblDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University of Vienna.
R KimmigDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Duisburg-Essen.
P MallmannDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cologne University.
für die AGO Uterus der DGGG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The value of transvaginal ultrasound in gynaecological examinations is beyond dispute. But it is of particular forensic importance that the validity of this type of imaging with regard to the reliable detection of early-stage malignancy is properly understood. Vaginal ultrasound screening in asymptomatic patients for the early detection of endometrial carcinoma is not useful from a medical point of view, nor is it cost-efficient. However, even though the validity of transvaginal ultrasound for screening has currently not been proven, the method should still be an integral part of gynaecological examinations.

Indexed as

endometrial cancerscreeningtransvaginal ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID25278620
PMCPMC4168340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.