Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25278245›Full record

GuidelineEuropean radiology2015

Clinical indications for computed tomographic colonography: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline.

Cristiano Spada, Jaap Stoker, Onofre Alarcon, Federico Barbaro, Davide Bellini, Michael Bretthauer, Margriet C De Haan, Jean-Marc Dumonceau, Monika Ferlitsch, Steve Halligan and 12 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in European radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Approach to gastroenterological diseases in primary care.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Reducing disparities and achieving health equity in colorectal cancer screening.Techniques and innovations in gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. EXTRACOLONIC FINDINGS-IDENTIFICATION AT LOW-DOSE CTC.Radiation protection dosimetry · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Efficacy of CO₂ Infusion for Preoperative Computed Tomographic Angiography with Computed Tomographic Colonography.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Cristiano SpadaDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
Jaap Stoker
Onofre Alarcon
Federico Barbaro
Davide Bellini
Michael Bretthauer
Margriet C De Haan
Jean-Marc Dumonceau
Monika Ferlitsch
Steve Halligan
Emma Helbren
Mikael Hellstrom
Ernst J Kuipers
Philippe Lefere
Thomas Mang
Emanuele Neri
Lucio Petruzziello
Andrew Plumb
Daniele Regge
Stuart A Taylor
Cesare Hassan
Andrea Laghi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Colonography, Computed TomographicColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsContraindicationsEarly Detection of CancerHumansIncidental FindingsIntestinal ObstructionLong-Term CareNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOccult BloodPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient SafetyRisk AssessmentSensitivity and SpecificityTime-to-Treatment

Identifiers

PMID25278245
PMCPMC4291518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.