Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25277973›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Tug-of-war between driver and passenger mutations in cancer and other adaptive processes.

Christopher D McFarland, Leonid A Mirny, Kirill S Korolev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Indirect genomic effects shape cancer risk across species.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A dynamical limit to evolutionary adaptation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Reuniting philosophy and science to advance cancer research.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. A dynamical limit to evolutionary adaptation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Tumour Genetic Heterogeneity in Relation to Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Anti-Cancer Treatment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher D McFarlandGraduate Program in Biophysics, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115;
Leonid A MirnyGraduate Program in Biophysics, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115; Department of Physics and Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139; and leonid@mit.edu korolev@bu.edu.
Kirill S KorolevDepartment of Physics and Department of Physics and Program in Bioinformatics, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215 leonid@mit.edu korolev@bu.edu.

Funding

TRANS-NETWORK PROJECTSU54CA143874 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI CHAKRABORTY, ARUP K. · 2009 to 2013
$15.1M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143874NCI NIH HHS U54CA143874
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer progression is an example of a rapid adaptive process where evolving new traits is essential for survival and requires a high mutation rate. Precancerous cells acquire a few key mutations that drive rapid population growth and carcinogenesis. Cancer genomics demonstrates that these few driver mutations occur alongside thousands of random passenger mutations--a natural consequence of cancer's elevated mutation rate. Some passengers are deleterious to cancer cells, yet have been largely ignored in cancer research. In population genetics, however, the accumulation of mildly deleterious mutations has been shown to cause population meltdown. Here we develop a stochastic population model where beneficial drivers engage in a tug-of-war with frequent mildly deleterious passengers. These passengers present a barrier to cancer progression describable by a critical population size, below which most lesions fail to progress, and a critical mutation rate, above which cancers melt down. We find support for this model in cancer age-incidence and cancer genomics data that also allow us to estimate the fitness advantage of drivers and fitness costs of passengers. We identify two regimes of adaptive evolutionary dynamics and use these regimes to understand successes and failures of different treatment strategies. A tumor's load of deleterious passengers can explain previously paradoxical treatment outcomes and suggest that it could potentially serve as a biomarker of response to mutagenic therapies. The collective deleterious effect of passengers is currently an unexploited therapeutic target. We discuss how their effects might be exacerbated by current and future therapies.

Indexed as

Mutation RateBiomarkers, TumorComputer SimulationDisease ProgressionGenetics, PopulationGenomicsHumansIncidenceModels, GeneticModels, TheoreticalNeoplasmsNeoplastic ProcessesProbabilityStochastic ProcessesBiomarkers, Tumorcancer genomicschemotherapyevolutionmathematical modelingsimulations

Identifiers

PMID25277973
PMCPMC4210325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.