ArticleDer Unfallchirurg2014
[More patients in a shorter inpatient stay with better outcome in treatment of femoral neck fracture: external quality assurance in Westfalia-Lippe on 50,354 patients].
Article in Der Unfallchirurg, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Development of the inpatient quality of care of surgically treated patients with a proximal femoral fracture in North Rhine-Westphalia : Analysis of 61,249 treatment courses based on data from external inpatient quality assurance].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022Article
- Article
- [Management of pre-existing anticoagulation for timely treatment of proximal femoral fractures].Der Unfallchirurg · 2019Review
- Quality assurance in revision total hip arthroplasty.Journal of orthopaedics · 2018Article
- Femur neck fracture in young adults, is it really an urgent surgery indication: retrospective clinical study.The Pan African medical journal · 2018Article
- [Reasons for proximal femoral fracture surgery delays : Analysis of the structured dialog in Rheinland-Pfalz].Der Unfallchirurg · 2016Article
- Quality assurance in primary total hip arthroplasty.Journal of orthopaedicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe show a comparison between two patient groups of the inpatient population suffering from femoral neck fractures registered in the external quality assurance between 1993 and 1997 and between 2005 and 2009.
resultsThe comparison between two patient groups showed the following developments: an increase in patient numbers per year from 4,229 to 5,842 where the average age remained constant but the proportion of elderly patients over 70 years old increased; the period of hospitalization was clearly shorter (from 27 days to 18 days); an increase in comorbidities (according to the ASA classification) with simultaneous decrease of the complication rate (from 11.1% to 7.6%). The inhospital mortality remained constant at 5.3%. At the same time the number of hospitals which treat patients with femoral neck fractures decreased from 166 to 150. Concurrently the number of patients per hospital and year increased from 23.6 to 41.3 cases.
conclusionThe technique of operative treatment changed and while during the 1990s many patients with femoral neck fractures were treated by implanting a total endoprosthesis, in the 2000s treatment was dominated by the hemi prosthesis. During the two periods of study use of the osteosynthesis technique decreased. In conclusion, the study showed an obvious compression of performance in trauma surgery but despite everything there was a clear improvement of treatment quality with respect to complication rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25277727What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.