Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25277727›Full record

ArticleDer Unfallchirurg2014

[More patients in a shorter inpatient stay with better outcome in treatment of femoral neck fracture: external quality assurance in Westfalia-Lippe on 50,354 patients].

R Smektala, U Schulze-Raestrup, C Müller-Mai, H Siebert

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Unfallchirurg, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

R SmektalaKlinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum-Langendreer, Universitätsklinik der Ruhr Universität Bochum, In der Schornau 23-25, 44892, Bochum, Deutschland, ruediger.smektala@rub.de.
U Schulze-Raestrup
C Müller-Mai
H Siebert

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe show a comparison between two patient groups of the inpatient population suffering from femoral neck fractures registered in the external quality assurance between 1993 and 1997 and between 2005 and 2009.

resultsThe comparison between two patient groups showed the following developments: an increase in patient numbers per year from 4,229 to 5,842 where the average age remained constant but the proportion of elderly patients over 70 years old increased; the period of hospitalization was clearly shorter (from 27 days to 18 days); an increase in comorbidities (according to the ASA classification) with simultaneous decrease of the complication rate (from 11.1% to 7.6%). The inhospital mortality remained constant at 5.3%. At the same time the number of hospitals which treat patients with femoral neck fractures decreased from 166 to 150. Concurrently the number of patients per hospital and year increased from 23.6 to 41.3 cases.

conclusionThe technique of operative treatment changed and while during the 1990s many patients with femoral neck fractures were treated by implanting a total endoprosthesis, in the 2000s treatment was dominated by the hemi prosthesis. During the two periods of study use of the osteosynthesis technique decreased. In conclusion, the study showed an obvious compression of performance in trauma surgery but despite everything there was a clear improvement of treatment quality with respect to complication rates.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionArthroplasty, Replacement, HipFemaleFemoral Neck FracturesFracture Fixation, InternalGermanyHip ProsthesisHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceQuality Assurance, Health Care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.