Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25277546›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2014

SNP array profiling of mouse cell lines identifies their strains of origin and reveals cross-contamination and widespread aneuploidy.

John P Didion, Ryan J Buus, Zohreh Naghashfar, David W Threadgill, Herbert C Morse, Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prevalence and Prevention of Reproducibility Deficiencies in Life Sciences Research: Large-Scale Meta-Analyses.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Best practices for authenticating cell lines.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2017
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

John P Didion
Ryan J Buus
Zohreh Naghashfar
David W Threadgill
Herbert C MorseDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB 7295, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7264, USA. hmorse@niaid.nih.gov.
Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USNational Institutes of Health · USTexas A&M University · US

Funding

An Interdisciplinary program for systems genomics of complex behaviorsP50MH090338 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PARDO-MANUEL DE VILLENA, FERNANDO · 2009 to 2010
$6.0M
An Interdisciplinary program for systems genomics of complex behaviorsP50HG006582 · NHGRI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PARDO-MANUEL DE VILLENA, FERNANDO · 2011 to 2013
$2.6M
UNC Predoc Training Progr in Bioinformatics/Comp BiologyT32GM067553 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ELSTON, TIMOTHY C · 2005 to 2019
$2.5M
Intramural NIH HHSNHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG006582NIGMS NIH HHS GM067553-04NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM067553NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH090338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe crisis of Misidentified and contaminated cell lines have plagued the biological research community for decades. Some repositories and journals have heeded calls for mandatory authentication of human cell lines, yet misidentification of mouse cell lines has received little publicity despite their importance in sponsored research. Short tandem repeat (STR) profiling is the standard authentication method, but it may fail to distinguish cell lines derived from the same inbred strain of mice. Additionally, STR profiling does not reveal karyotypic changes that occur in some high-passage lines and may have functional consequences. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) profiling has been suggested as a more accurate and versatile alternative to STR profiling; however, a high-throughput method for SNP-based authentication of mouse cell lines has not been described.

resultsWe have developed computational methods (Cell Line Authentication by SNP Profiling, CLASP) for cell line authentication and copy number analysis based on a cost-efficient SNP array, and we provide a reference database of commonly used mouse strains and cell lines. We show that CLASP readily discriminates among cell lines of diverse taxonomic origins, including multiple cell lines derived from a single inbred strain, intercross or wild caught mouse. CLASP is also capable of detecting contaminants present at concentrations as low as 5%. Of the 99 cell lines we tested, 15 exhibited substantial divergence from the reported genetic background. In all cases, we were able to distinguish whether the authentication failure was due to misidentification (one cell line, Ba/F3), the presence of multiple strain backgrounds (five cell lines), contamination by other cells and/or the presence of aneuploid chromosomes (nine cell lines).

conclusionsMisidentification and contamination of mouse cell lines is potentially as widespread as it is in human cell culture. This may have substantial implications for studies that are dependent on the expected background of their cell cultures. Laboratories can mitigate these risks by regular authentication of their cell cultures. Our results demonstrate that SNP array profiling is an effective method to combat cell line misidentification.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAneuploidyAnimalsCell LineCrosses, GeneticDNA Copy Number VariationsGene Expression ProfilingGenotypeLinkage DisequilibriumMiceMice, Inbred StrainsMicrosatellite RepeatsOligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis

Identifiers

PMID25277546
PMCPMC4198738
OpenAlexW2010153950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.