ArticleSurgical endoscopy2015
Quality of life after single-port laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign gynecologic disease.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Do preoperative depressive symptoms predict quality of life after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A longitudinal prospective study.PloS one · 2018Article
- Feasibility of reduced port surgery applying Higuchi's transverse incision.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of current study was to determine whether single-port laparoscopic surgery (SP-LS) improves the health-related quality of life (QoL) compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery (conventional LS) in women with benign gynecologic disease.
methodsWe performed a prospective case-control study from October 2010 to December 2012. A total of 273 women with benign gynecologic disease participated in this study, and 135 of them were in the SP-LS group and 138 in the conventional LS. We evaluated QoL after SP-LS or conventional LS. All patients were asked to complete short-form 36 (SF-36) QoL health surveys preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively.
resultsClinical characteristics and operative outcomes showed no significant differences between both groups. SP-LS had no benefits in QoL compared with conventional LS in the main categories, even though SP-LS showed statistically significant higher scores than conventional LS for the role of physical domain at 1 month postoperatively and for social function at 3 months postoperatively. In contrast to this, conventional LS had statistically significant higher scores than SP-LS for role function, bodily pain, general health, vitality, and emotional well-being at 6 months postoperatively.
conclusionsWith a 6-month follow-up, SP-LS does not offer a QoL benefit over conventional LS in women with benign gynecologic disease. However, a larger prospective randomized study would be required to confirm this.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.