ArticleSurgical endoscopy2015
Laparoscopic surgery after endoscopic resection for rectal cancer and neuroendocrine tumors.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a multicenter real-world study.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Improves Bloody Stool Associated with Polypoid Type Mucosal Prolapse Syndrome: A Case Series.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2022Article
- The Long-term Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the Treatment of Symptomatic Mucosal Prolapse Syndrome.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2021Article
- Short-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal neoplasms: An observational study.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndoscopic resection (ER) of tumors causes inflammation, edema, fibrosis, and adhesions in the surrounding tissue. However, little is known about the effect of ER on subsequent laparoscopic surgery for rectal tumors. The objective of this retrospective study was to analyze the effect of ER on subsequent laparoscopic surgery for rectal tumors.
methodsTwenty-eight patients underwent laparoscopic surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma with submucosal invasion or a rectal neuroendocrine tumor at our hospital between January 2005 and December 2012. A group of 14 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery with previous ER was compared to a group of 14 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery without previous ER.
resultsThough most fibrosis involved the submucosa after polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection, fibrosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection involved the muscularis propria in two patients, and the subserosa in one patient. There were no statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes between the groups.
conclusionLaparoscopic surgery after ER for rectal tumors is safe and feasible. Laparoscopic surgery is the reasonable first-choice for radical treatment of rectal tumors after ER.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.