ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2015
Coextraction and PCR Based Analysis of Nucleic Acids From Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Specimens.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- DNA Methylation and Gene Expression of the Cysteinyl Leukotriene Receptors as a Prognostic and Metastatic Factor for Colorectal Cancer Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Effect of preservation time of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues on extractable DNA and RNA quantity.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Article
- Lifestyle chemical carcinogens associated with mutations in cell cycle regulatory genes increases the susceptibility to gastric cancer risk.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018Article
- Novel APC gene mutations associated with protein alteration in diffuse type gastric cancer.BMC medical genetics · 2017Article
- Preparation of Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded Tissue Cores for both RNA and DNA Extraction.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRetrospective studies of archived human specimens, with known clinical follow-up, are used to identify predictive and prognostic molecular markers of disease. Due to biochemical differences, however, formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) DNA and RNA have generally been extracted separately from either different tissue sections or from the same section by dividing the digested tissue. Our optimized co-extraction approach provides the option of collecting DNA, which would otherwise be discarded or degraded, for additional or subsequent studies because of the high importance and less availability of clinical FFPE specimen.
methodsCoextraction of DNA and RNA from a single gastric cancer FFPE specimen was optimized by using TRIzol and purifying DNA from the lower aqueous and RNA from the upper organic phases. The protocol involves modification of incubation period for 30 min with proteinase K in glycin-tris-ethylenediamine tetra acetic acid buffer before adding TRIzol.
resultsAll samples tested successfully performed semiquantitative gene expression by reverse transcriptase PCR. The quantity and quality of DNA from FFPE samples was high which resulted in successful PCR amplification. The isolated DNA also aided in detection of Helicobacter pylori by amplifying the ribosomal 16S gene in a multiplex PCR reaction along with cagA.
conclusionThese results show that the RNA/DNA isolated by this method can be used for easy clinical diagnosis of disease-related gene expression as well as mutation and pathogen detection from a homogenous population of tumor cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.