Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25277234›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2014

Human limbal mesenchymal cells support the growth of human corneal epithelial stem/progenitor cells.

Martin N Nakatsu, Sheyla González, Hua Mei, Sophie X Deng

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Concise Review: Bioengineering of Limbal Stem Cell Niche.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Isolation andBio-protocol · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Limbal stem cell diseases.Experimental eye research · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martin N NakatsuCornea Division, Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Sheyla GonzálezCornea Division, Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Hua MeiCornea Division, Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Sophie X DengCornea Division, Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States.
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Vision Research Core at UCLAP30EY000331 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Gregory Darin Field, DAVID S WILLIAMS · 1985 to 2026
$16.8M
Ex Vivo Expansion of Human Limbal Stem Cells for TransplantationR01EY021797 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Sophie Deng · 2012 to 2026
$5.1M
NEI NIH HHS 5P30EY000331NEI NIH HHS P30 EY000331NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021797NEI NIH HHS R01EY021797
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe tested the viability of human limbal mesenchymal cells (LMCs) to support the expansion of human corneal epithelial stem/progenitor cells (LSCs).

methodsHuman LMCs were isolated from sclerocorneal tissue using collagenase A. Primary limbal epithelial cells (LECs) in the form of single cell suspension or cell clusters were cocultured on a monolayer of either 3T3 cells (control) or LMCs (SC-LMC culture). The LEC clusters also were grown directly on LMCs (CC-LMC culture) and in an optimized 3-dimensional culture method (3D CC-LMC culture). Colony-forming efficiency (CFE) and LEC proliferation were analyzed. The phenotype of the cultured LECs was assessed by their expression level of putative stem cell markers and a differentiation marker by qRT-PCR and immunocytochemistry.

resultsThe LECs in the SC-LMC culture had a very limited growth and the stem/progenitor phenotype was lost compared to the control. Growth and cell morphology improved using the CC-LMC culture. The 3D CC-LMC culture method was the best to support the growth of the LSC population. Expression of ATP-binding cassette family G2 and ΔNp63 at the mRNA level was maintained or increased in CC-LMCs and 3D CC-LMC cultures compared to the control. The percentage of the K14(+) and K12(+) cells was comparable in these three cultures. There was no significant difference in the percentage of p63α high expressing cells in the control (21%) and 3D CC-LMC culture (17%, P > 0.05).

conclusionsHuman LMCs can substitute 3T3 cells in the expansion of LSCs using the 3-dimensional culture system.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedEpithelium, CornealFemaleHumansLimbus CorneaeMaleMesenchymal Stem CellsMiddle AgedStem CellsYoung Adultcornea epitheliumfibroblastslimbal stem cell deficiencylimbal stem cellslimbusmesenchymalstem cell nichestem cells

Identifiers

PMID25277234
PMCPMC4215742
OpenAlexW1970496817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.