ArticleHerz2015
ECG-gated coronary angiography enables submillisievert imaging in invasive cardiology.
Article in Herz, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe median dose area products (DAP) and effective doses (ED) of patients arising from coronary angiography (CA) are considerable: According the 2013 National German Registry, they amount to 19.8 Gy × cm(2) and 4.0 mSv, respectively.
methodsWe investigated the feasibility of prospective electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated coronary angiography (CA)-a novel technique in invasive cardiology-with respect to possible reduction in irradiation effects. Instead of universally fix-rated radiographic acquisition within 7.5-15 frames/s, one single frame/heartbeat was triggered toward the diastolic moment immediately before atrial contraction (77 % of ECG-RR interval) most likely to provide motion-free and hence optimized resolution of the coronary tree. For 200 patients (body mass index 27.8 kg/m(2), age 67.5 years, male 55 %, 68 bpm) undergoing ECG-gated CA, we measured various median (interquartile range) parameters for radiation exposure.
resultsThe total DAP was 0.64 (0.46-1.00), radiographic fraction was 0.30 (0.19-0.43), and fluoroscopic fraction was 0.35 (0.21-0.57) Gy × cm(2). Radiographic imaging occurred within 21.7 s (17.1-26.3), with 25 frames (20-30) over the course of 7 runs (6-8). Fluoroscopy time was 119 s (94-141). Radiographic DAP was 12.6 mGy × cm(2)/frame and 13.8 mGy × cm(2)/s. Fluoroscopic DAP was 0.8 mGy × cm(2)/pulse and 3.1 mGy × cm(2)/s. Patient reference point air kerma was 17.0 mGy (11.1-28.1) and contrast volume was 70 ml (60-85).
conclusionIn conclusion, invasive ECG-gated coronary imaging is feasible in clinical routine and enables patient EDs of approx. 3 % of typical values in invasive cardiology: 0.13 mSv (0.09-0.20).
Indexed as
Identifiers
25277222What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.