Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25277042›Full record

ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2014

Designation of obesity as a disease: lessons learned from alcohol and tobacco.

Ryan T Hurt, Jithinraj Edakkanambeth Varayil, Manpreet S Mundi, Robert G Martindale, Jon O Ebbert

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Phenotypes of Obesity: How it Impacts Management.Current gastroenterology reports · 2017
    Review
  7. The muddle of medicalization: pathologizing or medicalizing?Theoretical medicine and bioethics · 2017
    Article
  8. Obesity as a Socially Defined Disease: Philosophical Considerations and Implications for Policy and Care.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ryan T HurtDivision of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA, hurt.ryan@mayo.edu.
Jithinraj Edakkanambeth Varayil
Manpreet S Mundi
Robert G Martindale
Jon O Ebbert

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity is a leading cause of preventable death in the USA. The American Medical Association recently recognized obesity as meeting the definition of a chronic disease. This declaration had the intention of improving screening and long-term treatment and is historically similar to the designation of tobacco and alcohol dependence as a chronic disease. Nevertheless, it has ignited a nationwide debate in both academia and public opinion. The current article reviews the implications of treating obesity as a chronic disease, comparing the similarities in pathophysiology of obesity and other addictions, and discusses the pros and cons of this designation as it pertains to health care workers and patients.

Indexed as

AlcoholismChronic DiseaseDelivery of Health CareHumansObesityTobacco Use Disorder

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.