Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25276813›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2014

Peripheral nerve reconstruction after injury: a review of clinical and experimental therapies.

D Grinsell, C P Keating

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06977607 (Comparative Study Between Platelet- Rich Fibrin Versus Nano-Fat in Improving Facial Nerve Regeneration After Traumatic Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 453 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
453citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06977607 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Study Between Platelet- Rich Fibrin Versus Nano-Fat in Improving Facial Nerve Regeneration After Traumatic Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled21ConditionsFacial Nerve Injuries, Facial TraumaArmsPlatelets Rich Fibrin, Nano-fat stem cells (NFSCs), Repair only
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

453 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

393 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

D GrinsellPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, St. Vincent's Hospital, 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, Melbourne, VIC 3065, Australia.
C P KeatingPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, St. Vincent's Hospital, 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, Melbourne, VIC 3065, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlike other tissues in the body, peripheral nerve regeneration is slow and usually incomplete. Less than half of patients who undergo nerve repair after injury regain good to excellent motor or sensory function and current surgical techniques are similar to those described by Sunderland more than 60 years ago. Our increasing knowledge about nerve physiology and regeneration far outweighs our surgical abilities to reconstruct damaged nerves and successfully regenerate motor and sensory function. It is technically possible to reconstruct nerves at the fascicular level but not at the level of individual axons. Recent surgical options including nerve transfers demonstrate promise in improving outcomes for proximal nerve injuries and experimental molecular and bioengineering strategies are being developed to overcome biological roadblocks limiting patient recovery.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansNerve RegenerationPeripheral Nerve InjuriesPeripheral NervesPlastic Surgery ProceduresRecovery of FunctionTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID25276813
PMCPMC4167952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.