Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25276800›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2014

Structural comparison, substrate specificity, and inhibitor binding of AGPase small subunit from monocot and dicot: present insight and future potential.

Kishore Sarma, Priyabrata Sen, Madhumita Barooah, Manabendra D Choudhury, Shubhadeep Roychoudhury, Mahendra K Modi

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Functional Analysis of Starch Metabolism in Plants.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kishore SarmaAgri-Bioinformatics Promotion Programme, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam 785013, India ; Department of Life Science & Bioinformatics, Assam University, Silchar, Assam 788011, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1792-1522
Priyabrata SenAgri-Bioinformatics Promotion Programme, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam 785013, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9250-9362
Madhumita BarooahAgri-Bioinformatics Promotion Programme, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam 785013, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3768-5336
Manabendra D ChoudhuryDepartment of Life Science & Bioinformatics, Assam University, Silchar, Assam 788011, India.
Shubhadeep RoychoudhuryDepartment of Life Science & Bioinformatics, Assam University, Silchar, Assam 788011, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4174-1852
Mahendra K ModiAgri-Bioinformatics Promotion Programme, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam 785013, India.
Assam Agricultural University · INAssam University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGPase) is the first rate limiting enzyme of starch biosynthesis pathway and has been exploited as the target for greater starch yield in several plants. The structure-function analysis and substrate binding specificity of AGPase have provided enormous potential for understanding the role of specific amino acid or motifs responsible for allosteric regulation and catalytic mechanisms, which facilitate the engineering of AGPases. We report the three-dimensional structure, substrate, and inhibitor binding specificity of AGPase small subunit from different monocot and dicot crop plants. Both monocot and dicot subunits were found to exploit similar interactions with the substrate and inhibitor molecule as in the case of their closest homologue potato tuber AGPase small subunit. Comparative sequence and structural analysis followed by molecular docking and electrostatic surface potential analysis reveal that rearrangements of secondary structure elements, substrate, and inhibitor binding residues are strongly conserved and follow common folding pattern and orientation within monocot and dicot displaying a similar mode of allosteric regulation and catalytic mechanism. The results from this study along with site-directed mutagenesis complemented by molecular dynamics simulation will shed more light on increasing the starch content of crop plants to ensure the food security worldwide.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceEnzyme InhibitorsGlucose-1-Phosphate AdenylyltransferaseMagnoliopsidaMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Sequence DataPoaceaeProtein Structure, SecondaryProtein Structure, TertiaryProtein SubunitsSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, ProteinStatic ElectricityStructural Homology, ProteinSubstrate SpecificityEnzyme InhibitorsGlucose-1-Phosphate AdenylyltransferaseProtein Subunits

Identifiers

PMID25276800
PMCPMC4167649
OpenAlexW2037580817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.