Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25276629›Full record

ArticlePerspectives in clinical research2014

Utilization of potentially inappropriate medications in elderly patients in a tertiary care teaching hospital in India.

Binit N Jhaveri, Tejas K Patel, Manish J Barvaliya, Chandrabhanu Tripathi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives in clinical research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Drug interactions in elderly (Amirkola Health and Ageing Project).Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Binit N JhaveriDepartment of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India.
Tejas K PatelDepartment of Pharmacology, GMERS Medical College, Gotri, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
Manish J BarvaliyaDepartment of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India.
Chandrabhanu TripathiDepartment of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the use of potentially inappropriate medicines in elderly inpatients in a tertiary care teaching hospital. MATERIALS AND

methodsRetrospective analysis was performed for cases of elderly patients admitted between January 2010 and December 2010. Data on age, gender, diagnosis, duration of hospital stay, treatment, and outcome were collected. Prescriptions were assessed for the use of potentially inappropriate medications in geriatric patients by using American Geriatric Society Beer's criteria (2012) and PRISCUS list (2010).

resultsA total of 676 geriatric patients (52.12% females) were admitted in the medicine ward. The average age of geriatric patients was 72.69 years. According to Beer's criteria, at least one inappropriate medicine was prescribed in 590 (87.3%) patients. Metoclopramide (54.3%), alprazolam (9%), diazepam (8%), digoxin > 0.125 mg/day (5%), and diclofenac (3.7%) were the commonly used inappropriate medications. Use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in heart and renal failure patients was the commonly identified drug-disease interaction. According to PRISCUS list, at least one inappropriate medication was prescribed in 210 (31.06%) patients.

conclusionUse of inappropriate medicines is highly prevalent in elderly patients.

Indexed as

Beer's criteriadrug-disease interactiongeriatric patientsinappropriate medicines

Identifiers

PMID25276629
PMCPMC4170537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.