Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25276472›Full record

ReviewVeterinary medicine international2014

Challenges and economic implications in the control of foot and mouth disease in sub-saharan Africa: lessons from the zambian experience.

Y Sinkala, M Simuunza, D U Pfeiffer, H M Munang'andu, M Mulumba, C J Kasanga, J B Muma, A S Mweene

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary medicine international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Seroprevalence of Bovine Brucellosis in Selected Districts of Zambia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Y SinkalaDepartment of Veterinary Services, Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock, P.O. Box 50060, Lusaka, Zambia ; Department of Disease Control, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
M SimuunzaDepartment of Disease Control, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
D U PfeifferRoyal Veterinary College, London AL9 7TA, UK.
H M Munang'anduNorwegian School of Veterinary Sciences, Ullevålsveien, P.O. Box 8146, 0033 Oslo, Norway.
M MulumbaOnderstepoort Veterinary Institute, Agricultural Research Council, Old Soutpan Road, Onderstepoort, Pretoria 0110, South Africa.
C J KasangaSokoine University of Agriculture, P.O. Box 3297, Chuo Kikuuu, Morogoro, Tanzania.
J B MumaDepartment of Disease Control, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
A S MweeneDepartment of Disease Control, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foot and mouth disease is one of the world's most important livestock diseases for trade. FMD infections are complex in nature and there are many epidemiological factors needing clarification. Key questions relate to the control challenges and economic impact of the disease for resource-poor FMD endemic countries like Zambia. A review of the control challenges and economic impact of FMD outbreaks in Zambia was made. Information was collected from peer-reviewed journals articles, conference proceedings, unpublished scientific reports, and personal communication with scientists and personal field experiences. The challenges of controlling FMD using mainly vaccination and movement control are discussed. Impacts include losses in income of over US$ 1.6 billion from exports of beef and sable antelopes and an annual cost of over US$ 2.7 million on preventive measures. Further impacts included unquantified losses in production and low investment in agriculture resulting in slow economic growth. FMD persistence may be a result of inadequate epidemiological understanding of the disease and ineffectiveness of the control measures that are being applied. The identified gaps may be considered in the annual appraisal of the FMD national control strategy in order to advance on the progressive control pathway.

Identifiers

PMID25276472
PMCPMC4158296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.