Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25276335›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2014

Structuring research methods and data with the research object model: genomics workflows as a case study.

Kristina M Hettne, Harish Dharuri, Jun Zhao, Katherine Wolstencroft, Khalid Belhajjame, Stian Soiland-Reyes, Eleni Mina, Mark Thompson, Don Cruickshank, Lourdes Verdes-Montenegro and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. CyVerse: Cyberinfrastructure for open science.PLoS computational biology · 2024
    Article
  3. Data Management and Modeling in Plant Biology.Frontiers in plant science · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. RABIX: AN OPEN-SOURCE WORKFLOW EXECUTOR SUPPORTING RECOMPUTABILITY AND INTEROPERABILITY OF WORKFLOW DESCRIPTIONS.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2017
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Combining computational models, semantic annotations and simulation experiments in a graph database.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Kristina M HettneDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Harish DharuriDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jun ZhaoDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Katherine WolstencroftSchool of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK ; Leiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Khalid BelhajjameSchool of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Stian Soiland-ReyesSchool of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Eleni MinaDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Mark ThompsonDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Don CruickshankDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Lourdes Verdes-MontenegroInstituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía, Granada, Spain.
Julian GarridoInstituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía, Granada, Spain.
David de RoureDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Oscar CorchoOntology Engineering Group, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Graham KlyneDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Reinout van SchouwenDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Peter A C 't HoenDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Sean BechhoferSchool of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Carole GobleSchool of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Marco RoosDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne of the main challenges for biomedical research lies in the computer-assisted integrative study of large and increasingly complex combinations of data in order to understand molecular mechanisms. The preservation of the materials and methods of such computational experiments with clear annotations is essential for understanding an experiment, and this is increasingly recognized in the bioinformatics community. Our assumption is that offering means of digital, structured aggregation and annotation of the objects of an experiment will provide necessary meta-data for a scientist to understand and recreate the results of an experiment. To support this we explored a model for the semantic description of a workflow-centric Research Object (RO), where an RO is defined as a resource that aggregates other resources, e.g., datasets, software, spreadsheets, text, etc. We applied this model to a case study where we analysed human metabolite variation by workflows.

resultsWe present the application of the workflow-centric RO model for our bioinformatics case study. Three workflows were produced following recently defined Best Practices for workflow design. By modelling the experiment as an RO, we were able to automatically query the experiment and answer questions such as "which particular data was input to a particular workflow to test a particular hypothesis?", and "which particular conclusions were drawn from a particular workflow?".

conclusionsApplying a workflow-centric RO model to aggregate and annotate the resources used in a bioinformatics experiment, allowed us to retrieve the conclusions of the experiment in the context of the driving hypothesis, the executed workflows and their input data. The RO model is an extendable reference model that can be used by other systems as well. AVAILABILITY: The Research Object is available at http://www.myexperiment.org/packs/428 The Wf4Ever Research Object Model is available at http://wf4ever.github.io/ro.

Indexed as

Digital librariesGenome wide association studyScientific workflowsSemantic web models

Identifiers

PMID25276335
PMCPMC4177597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.