Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25276333›Full record

ReviewExperimental & translational stroke medicine2014

The influence of functional electrical stimulation on hand motor recovery in stroke patients: a review.

Fanny Quandt, Friedhelm C Hummel

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental & translational stroke medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02887872 nacompletednot on this map

Combining Electrical Stimulation and a Dynamic Hand Orthosis for Functional Recovery in Chronic Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Texas Medical Branch, GalvestonRan2011 to 2013Enrolled4ConditionsStrokeArmsElectrical stimulation-dynamic hand orthosis
NCT03016923 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Functional Electrical Stimulation Paired With Intensive Therapy to Improve Hand Function in Children With Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy

TypeinterventionalSponsorHolland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation HospitalRan2016 to 2017Enrolled3ConditionsCerebral PalsyArmsFES Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 151 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. The effects of concurrent M1 anodal tDCS and physical therapy interventions on function of ankle muscles in patients with stroke: a randomized, double-blinded sham-controlled trial study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Combined Brain and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in Chronic Stroke Patients With Moderate to Severe Motor Impairment.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2018
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. NRV: An open framework forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fanny QuandtBrain Imaging and Neurostimulation (BINS) Labor, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, Hamburg W34 20246, Germany.
Friedhelm C HummelBrain Imaging and Neurostimulation (BINS) Labor, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, Hamburg W34 20246, Germany ; Favaloro University Av, Belgrano 1746, Buenos Aires C1093AAS, Argentina.
Universität Hamburg · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuromuscular stimulation has been used as one potential rehabilitative treatment option to restore motor function and improve recovery in patients with paresis. Especially stroke patients who often regain only limited hand function would greatly benefit from a therapy that enhances recovery and restores movement. Multiple studies investigated the effect of functional electrical stimulation on hand paresis, the results however are inconsistent. Here we review the current literature on functional electrical stimulation on hand motor recovery in stroke patients. We discuss the impact of different parameters such as stage after stoke, degree of impairment, spasticity and treatment protocols on the functional outcome. Importantly, we outline the results from recent studies investigating the cortical effects elicited by functional electrical stimulation giving insights into the underlying mechanisms responsible for long-term treatment effects. Bringing together the findings from present research it becomes clear that both, treatment outcomes as well as the neurophysiologic mechanisms causing functional recovery, vary depending on patient characteristics. In order to develop unified treatment guidelines it is essential to conduct homogenous studies assessing the impact of different parameters on rehabilitative success.

Indexed as

FESFunctional electrical stimulationHandNeuromuscular electrical stimulationNeuroprothesisNMESRehabilitationStrokeUpper extremity

Identifiers

PMID25276333
PMCPMC4178310
OpenAlexW2115463211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.