ReviewWorld journal of cardiology2014
Newer methods of cardiac output monitoring.
Review in World journal of cardiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Observational Study Comparing NICOM-Cheetah Versus Flotrac-Vigileo for Cardiac Output Monitoring in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit.
Comparison of Transthoracic Electrical Bioimpedance and Pulse Contour Analysis in Renal Transplantation Patients: Analysis of Intraoperative Cardiac Output, Systemic Vascular Resistant and Stroke Volume Variation
Paceport Swan-Ganz Data Collection Study
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Higher Versus Lower Blood Pressure Targets on Pulmonary Vascular Hemodynamics During Intensive Care After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2026Trial
- Serial assessments of cardiac output and mixed venous oxygen saturation in comatose patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Trial
- Suspension syndrome: a potentially fatal vagally mediated circulatory collapse-an experimental randomized crossover trial.European journal of applied physiology · 2019Trial
- Trial
- A Novel Method for Cardiac Output and Vascular Parameters Estimation Using Peripheral Arterial Waveforms: Integrating Windkessel Model viaAnnals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Performance evaluation of non-invasive cardiac output monitoring device (HemoVista) based on multi-channel thoracic impedance plethysmography technology.Acute and critical care · 2024Article
- Pulmonary Embolism in Critically Ill Patients-Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Realistic Aspects of Cardiac Ultrasound in Rats: Practical Tips for Improved Examination.Journal of imaging · 2024Review
- LDCNN: A new arrhythmia detection technique with ECG signals using a linear deep convolutional neural network.Physiological reports · 2024Article
- Technical and analytical approach to biventricular pressure-volume loops in swine including a completely endovascular, percutaneous closed-chest large animal model.JVS-vascular science · 2024Article
- Comparison of invasive and non-invasive measurements of cardiac index and systemic vascular resistance in living-donor liver transplantation: a prospective, observational study.BMC anesthesiology · 2023Observational
- Continuous cerebral blood flow monitoring: What should we do with these extra numbers?BJA open · 2023Article
- Article
- Physicians' Clinical Behavior During Fluid Evaluation Encounters.Critical care explorations · 2023Article
- Measuring the accuracy of cardiac output using POCUS: the introduction of artificial intelligence into routine care.The ultrasound journal · 2022Article
- Article
- Measurement of Cardiac Output Using an Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor (USCOM) in Patients with Single-Ventricle Physiology.Pediatric cardiology · 2022Article
- Bioreactance-derived haemodynamic parameters in the transitional phase in preterm neonates: a longitudinal study.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2022Observational
- Noninvasive Cardiac Output Monitoring Using Electrical Cardiometry and Outcomes in Critically Ill Children.Journal of pediatric intensive care · 2022Article
- Estimation of cardiac output variations induced by hemodynamic interventions using multi-beat analysis of arterial waveform: a comparative off-line study with transesophageal Doppler method during non-cardiac surgery.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac output (CO) is the volume of blood ejected by each ventricle per minute and is the product of stroke volume and heart rate. CO can thus be manipulated by alteration in heart rate or rhythm, preload, contractility and afterload. Moreover it gives important information about tissue perfusion and oxygen delivery. CO can be measured by various methods and thermodilution method using pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) is till date considered as gold standard method. Complications associated with PAC led to development of newer methods which are minimally or non-invasive. Newer methods fulfil other properties like continuous and reproducible reading, cost effective, reliable during various physiological states and have fast response time. These methods are validated against the gold standard with good level agreement. In this review we have discussed various newer methods of CO monitoring and their effectiveness in clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.