Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25276221›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2014

Validation in principal components analysis applied to EEG data.

João Carlos G D Costa, Paulo José G Da-Silva, Renan Moritz V R Almeida, Antonio Fernando C Infantosi

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Soft, curved electrode systems capable of integration on the auricle as a persistent brain-computer interface.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

João Carlos G D CostaBiomedical Engineering Program, COPPE, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, P.O. Box 68510, 21941-972 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Paulo José G Da-SilvaBiomedical Engineering Program, COPPE, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, P.O. Box 68510, 21941-972 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Renan Moritz V R AlmeidaBiomedical Engineering Program, COPPE, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, P.O. Box 68510, 21941-972 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Antonio Fernando C InfantosiBiomedical Engineering Program, COPPE, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, P.O. Box 68510, 21941-972 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The well-known multivariate technique Principal Components Analysis (PCA) is usually applied to a sample, and so component scores are subjected to sampling variability. However, few studies address their stability, an important topic when the sample size is small. This work presents three validation procedures applied to PCA, based on confidence regions generated by a variant of a nonparametric bootstrap called the partial bootstrap: (i) the assessment of PC scores variability by the spread and overlapping of "confidence regions" plotted around these scores; (ii) the use of the confidence regions centroids as a validation set; and (iii) the definition of the number of nontrivial axes to be retained for analysis. The methods were applied to EEG data collected during a postural control protocol with twenty-four volunteers. Two axes were retained for analysis, with 91.6% of explained variance. Results showed that the area of the confidence regions provided useful insights on the variability of scores and suggested that some subjects were not distinguishable from others, which was not evident from the principal planes. In addition, potential outliers, initially suggested by an analysis of the first principal plane, could not be confirmed by the confidence regions.

Indexed as

Signal Processing, Computer-AssistedAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalMultivariate AnalysisPrincipal Component AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsResearch DesignSample SizeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25276221
PMCPMC4170877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.