ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2014
Short-term ECG recordings for heart rate assessment in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation.
Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of ramipril/hydrochlorothiazide and ramipril/canrenone combination on atrial fibrillation recurrence in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients with and without cardiac autonomic neuropathy.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2017Article
- Evaluating the benefits of home-based management of atrial fibrillation: current perspectives.Pragmatic and observational research · 2016Review
- Connexin and fibrosis related microRNAs in complex fractionated atrial electrograms.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2015Article
- The trigeminocardiac reflex - a comparison with the diving reflex in humans.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThere is no consensus on the length of ECG tracing that should be recorded to represent adequate rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation (AFib). The purpose of the study was to examine whether heart rate measurements based on short-term ECGs recorded at different periods of the day may correspond to the mean heart rate and rate irregularity analyzed from standard 24-hour Holter monitoring. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe study enrolled 50 consecutive patients with chronic AFib who underwent 24-hour Holter monitoring. Mean heart rate (mHR) and the coefficient of irregularity (CI) were assessed from 5- and 60-minute intervals of Holter recordings in different periods of the day.
resultsThe highest correlation in mean heart rate interval within 24 h was found during a 6-hour sample and in the periods 11.00 AM-12.00 PM, 12 PM-1.00 PM, and 1.00 PM-2.00 PM. With respect to irregularity, only the CI measurements based on a 6-hour interval (7.00 AM-1.00 AM) show a correlation > 0.08 compared to data from the 24-hour recording.
conclusionsOnly long-term (6-hour) recordings provide a high correlation within 24 h in mean heart rate interval and coefficient of irregularity. It seems that the mean heart rate interval in 1-hour periods between 11 AM and 2 PM might be predictive for 24-hour data. Short time recordings of the coefficient of irregularity of heart rate in AFib patients at this moment are not useful in clinical practice for long-term prognosis of ventricular irregularity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.