Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25276122›Full record

ReviewGastroenterology research and practice2014

Extent of Surgery and Implications of Transection Margin Status after Resection of IPMNs.

Marina Paini, Stefano Crippa, Filippo Scopelliti, Andrea Baldoni, Alberto Manzoni, Giulio Belfiori, Stefano Partelli, Massimo Falconi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Pathology of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2021
    Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marina PainiDivision of Pancreatic Surgery, Ospedali Riuniti, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Stefano CrippaDivision of Pancreatic Surgery, Ospedali Riuniti, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Filippo ScopellitiDivision of Pancreatic Surgery, Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli, Via Monte Baldo 24, Peschiera del Garda Verona 37019, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5539-6653
Andrea BaldoniDivision of Pancreatic Surgery, Ospedali Riuniti, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Alberto ManzoniDivision of Pancreatic Surgery, Ospedali Riuniti, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1315-5373
Giulio BelfioriDivision of Pancreatic Surgery, Ospedali Riuniti, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Stefano PartelliDivision of Pancreatic Surgery, Ospedali Riuniti, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Massimo FalconiDivision of Pancreatic Surgery, Ospedali Riuniti, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1762-0316
Marche Polytechnic University · ITCasa di Cura Villa Garda · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Appropriate surgical strategies for management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) of the pancreas are a matter of debate. Preoperative and intraoperative evaluation of malignant potential of IPMN and of patient's comorbidities is of paramount importance to balance potential complications of surgery with tumors' risk of being or becoming malignant; the decision about the extent of pancreatic resection and the eventual total pancreatectomy needs to be determined on individual basis. The analysis of frozen-section margin of pancreas during operation is mandatory. The goal should be the complete resection of IPMN reaching negative margin, although there is still no agreed definition of "negative margin." Of note, the presence of deepithelization is often wrongly interpreted as absence of neoplasia. Management of resection margin status and stratification of surveillance of the remnant pancreas, based on characteristics of primary tumour, are of crucial importance in the management of IPMNs in order to decrease the risk of tumor recurrence after resection. Although risk of local and distant recurrence for invasive IPMNs is increased even in case of total pancreatectomy, also local recurrence after complete resection of noninvasive IPMNs is not negligible. Therefore, a long-term/life-time follow-up monitoring is of paramount importance to detect eventual recurrences.

Identifiers

PMID25276122
PMCPMC4167807
OpenAlexW2057468695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.