Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25275833›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurotrauma2015

Divergent long-term consequences of chronic treatment with haloperidol, risperidone, and bromocriptine on traumatic brain injury-induced cognitive deficits.

Thomas I Phelps, Corina O Bondi, Rashid H Ahmed, Yewande T Olugbade, Anthony E Kline

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurotrauma, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Enriched environment as a nonpharmacological neuroprotective strategy.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas I Phelps1 Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Corina O Bondi
Rashid H Ahmed
Yewande T Olugbade
Anthony E Kline
University of Pittsburgh · USCenter for the Neural Basis of Cognition · US

Funding

Optimizing Environmental Enrichment to Model Preclinical NeurorehabilitationR01NS084967 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KLINE, ANTHONY E. · 2014 to 2025
$3.7M
Environmental Enrichment and Cholinergic Mechanisms after TBIR01NS060005 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KLINE, ANTHONY E. · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
Understanding the Impact of Antipsychotic Drugs on Recovery After TBIR01HD069620 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KLINE, ANTHONY E. · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
NICHD NIH HHS HD069620NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069620NINDS NIH HHS NS060005NINDS NIH HHS NS084967
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antipsychotic drugs (APDs) are provided in the clinic to manage traumatic brain injury (TBI)-induced agitation and aggression. Experimental TBI studies consistently show that daily administration of the APDs, haloperidol (HAL) and risperidone (RISP), hinder recovery. However, it is unknown how long the adverse effects remain after cessation of treatment. To elucidate this clinically relevant issue, anesthetized male rats were randomly assigned to four TBI (controlled cortical impact) and four sham groups administered HAL (0.5 mg/kg), RISP (0.45 mg/kg), bromocriptine (BRO; 5.0 mg/kg, included as a control for D2 receptor action), or vehicle (VEH; 1 mL/kg) 24 h after surgery and once-daily for 19 days. Motor and cognitive recovery was assessed on days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively, and again at 1 and 3 months after drug withdrawal. No overall group differences were observed for motor function among the TBI groups, although the HAL group showed a greater beam-walk deficit on day 5 versus the VEH and BRO groups. Cognitive recovery was significantly impaired in the HAL and RISP groups during the treatment phase versus VEH and BRO. Further, BRO was superior to VEH (p=0.0042). At 1 month, both groups that received APDs continued to exhibit significant cognitive impairment versus VEH and BRO; at 3 months, only the HAL group was impaired. Moreover, the HAL, RISP, and VEH groups continued to be cognitively deficient versus BRO, which also reduced cortical damage. These data replicate previous reports that HAL and RISP impede cognitive recovery after TBI and expand the literature by revealing that the deleterious effects persist for 3 months after drug discontinuation. BRO conferred cognitive benefits when administered concomitantly with behavioral testing, thus replicating previous findings, and also after cessation demonstrating enduring efficacy.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesCognition DisordersAnimalsAntipsychotic AgentsBehavior, AnimalBromocriptineDopamine AgonistsHaloperidolMaleRandom AllocationRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRecovery of FunctionRisperidoneTime FactorsAntipsychotic AgentsBromocriptineDopamine AgonistsHaloperidolRisperidoneantipsychoticsbeam-walkingbehaviorbromocriptinecontrolled cortical impactfunctional recoverylearning and memoryMorris water mazetraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID25275833
PMCPMC4394178
OpenAlexW1558370375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.