ArticlePLoS computational biology2014
Cell type specific alterations in interchromosomal networks across the cell cycle.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spatiotemporal Epigenetic Control of the Histone Gene Chromatin Landscape during the Cell Cycle.Critical reviews in eukaryotic gene expression · 2023Article
- Epigenetic-Mediated Regulation of Gene Expression for Biological Control and Cancer: Cell and Tissue Structure, Function, and Phenotype.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2022Review
- Mitotic Antipairing of Homologous Chromosomes.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2022Article
- Ultra-Structural Imaging Provides 3D Organization of 46 Chromosomes of a Human Lymphocyte Prophase Nucleus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Chromosome territories and the global regulation of the genome.Genes, chromosomes & cancer · 2019Review
- Higher order genomic organization and epigenetic control maintain cellular identity and prevent breast cancer.Genes, chromosomes & cancer · 2019Review
- Interchromosomal interactions: A genomic love story of kissing chromosomes.The Journal of cell biology · 2019Review
- Intranuclear and higher-order chromatin organization of the major histone gene cluster in breast cancer.Journal of cellular physiology · 2018Article
- Cellular senescence induces replication stress with almost no affect on DNA replication timing.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2018Article
- SMARCA4 regulates gene expression and higher-order chromatin structure in proliferating mammary epithelial cells.Genome research · 2016Article
- Reorganization of the interchromosomal network during keratinocyte differentiation.Chromosoma · 2016Article
- Large-scale probabilistic 3D organization of human chromosome territories.Human molecular genetics · 2016Article
- Coordinated Action of Biological Processes during Embryogenesis Can Cause Genome-Wide Linkage Disequilibrium in the Human Genome and Influence Age-Related Phenotypes.Annals of gerontology and geriatric research · 2016Article
- Chromosomes at Work: Organization of Chromosome Territories in the Interphase Nucleus.Journal of cellular biochemistry · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The interchromosomal organization of a subset of human chromosomes (#1, 4, 11, 12, 16, 17, and 18) was examined in G1 and S phase of human WI38 lung fibroblast and MCF10A breast epithelial cells. Radial positioning of the chromosome territories (CTs) was independent of gene density, but size dependent. While no changes in radial positioning during the cell cycle were detected, there were stage-specific differences between cell types. Each CT was in close proximity (interaction) with a similar number of other CT except the gene rich CT17 which had significantly more interactions. Furthermore, CT17 was a member of the highest pairwise CT combinations with multiple interactions. Major differences were detected in the pairwise interaction profiles of MCF10A versus WI38 including cell cycle alterations from G1 to S. These alterations in interaction profiles were subdivided into five types: overall increase, overall decrease, switching from 1 to ≥2 interactions, vice versa, or no change. A global data mining program termed the chromatic median determined the most probable overall association network for the entire subset of CT. This probabilistic interchromosomal network was nearly completely different between the two cell lines. It was also strikingly altered across the cell cycle in MCF10A, but only slightly in WI38. We conclude that CT undergo multiple and preferred interactions with other CT in the nucleus and form preferred -albeit probabilistic- interchromosomal networks. This network of interactions is altered across the cell cycle and between cell types. It is intriguing to consider the relationship of these alterations to the corresponding changes in the gene expression program across the cell cycle and in different cell types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.