ArticlePLoS computational biology2014
Evidence of conformational selection driving the formation of ligand binding sites in protein-protein interfaces.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Silico Druggability Assessment ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Conformational Dynamics of the Active Site Loop in Dihydroorotase Highlighting the Limitations of Loop-In Structures for Inhibitor Docking.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Predicting multiple conformations of ligand binding sites in proteins suggests that AlphaFold2 may remember too much.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- SWISH-X, an Expanded Approach to Detect Cryptic Pockets in Proteins and at Protein-Protein Interfaces.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- Article
- Inhibition of protein interactions: co-crystalized protein-protein interfaces are nearly as good as holo proteins in rigid-body ligand docking.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2018Article
- Enhanced Sampling of Intrinsic Structural Heterogeneity of the BH3-Only Protein Binding Interface of Bcl-xL.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2017Article
- Rate Constants and Mechanisms of Protein-Ligand Binding.Annual review of biophysics · 2017Review
- Protein Ensembles: How Does Nature Harness Thermodynamic Fluctuations for Life? The Diverse Functional Roles of Conformational Ensembles in the Cell.Chemical reviews · 2016Review
- Principles and Overview of Sampling Methods for Modeling Macromolecular Structure and Dynamics.PLoS computational biology · 2016Review
- Drug repurposing to target Ebola virus replication and virulence using structural systems pharmacology.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Considerations of Protein Subpockets in Fragment-Based Drug Design.Chemical biology & drug design · 2016Article
- Are protein-protein interfaces special regions on a protein's surface?The Journal of chemical physics · 2015Article
- New Frontiers in Druggability.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2015Article
- Adaptability of protein structures to enable functional interactions and evolutionary implications.Current opinion in structural biology · 2015Review
- Lessons from Hot Spot Analysis for Fragment-Based Drug Discovery.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2015Review
- The FTMap family of web servers for determining and characterizing ligand-binding hot spots of proteins.Nature protocols · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are compelling targets for drug discovery, and in a number of cases can be disrupted by small molecules. The main goal of this study is to examine the mechanism of binding site formation in the interface region of proteins that are PPI targets by comparing ligand-free and ligand-bound structures. To avoid any potential bias, we focus on ensembles of ligand-free protein conformations obtained by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) techniques and deposited in the Protein Data Bank, rather than on ensembles specifically generated for this study. The measures used for structure comparison are based on detecting binding hot spots, i.e., protein regions that are major contributors to the binding free energy. The main tool of the analysis is computational solvent mapping, which explores the surface of proteins by docking a large number of small "probe" molecules. Although we consider conformational ensembles obtained by NMR techniques, the analysis is independent of the method used for generating the structures. Finding the energetically most important regions, mapping can identify binding site residues using ligand-free models based on NMR data. In addition, the method selects conformations that are similar to some peptide-bound or ligand-bound structure in terms of the properties of the binding site. This agrees with the conformational selection model of molecular recognition, which assumes such pre-existing conformations. The analysis also shows the maximum level of similarity between unbound and bound states that is achieved without any influence from a ligand. Further shift toward the bound structure assumes protein-peptide or protein-ligand interactions, either selecting higher energy conformations that are not part of the NMR ensemble, or leading to induced fit. Thus, forming the sites in protein-protein interfaces that bind peptides and can be targeted by small ligands always includes conformational selection, although other recognition mechanisms may also be involved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.