ArticleJournal of vision2014
Effects of target typicality on categorical search.
Article in Journal of vision, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- The influence of category representativeness on the low prevalence effect in visual search.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2023Article
- Assessing satisfaction of search in virtual mammograms for experienced and novice searchers.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
- Negative cues minimize visual search specificity effects.Vision research · 2022Article
- Real-world object categories and scene contexts conjointly structure statistical learning for the guidance of visual search.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2022Article
- Interaction of prior category knowledge and novel statistical patterns during visual search for real-world objects.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2022Article
- Categorical cuing: Object categories structure the acquisition of statistical regularities to guide visual search.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2021Article
- Typicality modulates attentional capture by object categories.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021Article
- Target templates in low target-distractor discriminability visual search have higher resolution, but the advantage they provide is short-lived.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021Article
- COCO-Search18 fixation dataset for predicting goal-directed attention control.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- When more is more: redundant modifiers can facilitate visual search.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2021Article
- Modulating "Surprise" with Syntax: A Study on Negative Sentences and Eye-Movement Recording.Journal of psycholinguistic research · 2020Article
- Incidental memory following rapid object processing: The role of attention allocation strategies.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2019Article
- Specifying the precision of guiding features for visual search.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2019Article
- Understanding Moment-to-Moment Processing of Visual Narratives.Cognitive science · 2018Article
- Using space to represent categories: insights from gaze position.Psychological research · 2017Article
- Look before you seek: Preview adds a fixed benefit to all searches.Journal of vision · 2016Article
- Searching for Category-Consistent Features: A Computational Approach to Understanding Visual Category Representation.Psychological science · 2016Article
- The anterior temporal cortex is a primary semantic source of top-down influences on object recognition.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2016Article
- Article
- Using multidimensional scaling to quantify similarity in visual search and beyond.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The role of target typicality in a categorical visual search task was investigated by cueing observers with a target name, followed by a five-item target present/absent search array in which the target images were rated in a pretest to be high, medium, or low in typicality with respect to the basic-level target cue. Contrary to previous work, we found that search guidance was better for high-typicality targets compared to low-typicality targets, as measured by both the proportion of immediate target fixations and the time to fixate the target. Consistent with previous work, we also found an effect of typicality on target verification times, the time between target fixation and the search judgment; as target typicality decreased, verification times increased. To model these typicality effects, we trained Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifiers on the target categories, and tested these on the corresponding specific targets used in the search task. This analysis revealed significant differences in classifier confidence between the high-, medium-, and low-typicality groups, paralleling the behavioral results. Collectively, these findings suggest that target typicality broadly affects both search guidance and verification, and that differences in typicality can be predicted by distance from an SVM classification boundary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.