Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25274804›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2014

Field evaluation of the InBios Chagas detect plus rapid test in serum and whole-blood specimens in Bolivia.

Vishal Shah, Lisbeth Ferrufino, Robert H Gilman, Margot Ramirez, Eliana Saenza, Edith Malaga, Gerardo Sanchez, Emi E Okamoto, Jacqueline E Sherbuck, Eva H Clark and 6 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Laboratory diagnosis ofFrontiers in parasitology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Risk Factors for Maternal Chagas Disease and Vertical Transmission in a Bolivian Hospital.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Vishal ShahSaint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Lisbeth FerrufinoUniversidad Catolica Boliviana, Santa Cruz, Plurinational State of Bolivia.
Robert H GilmanJohns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Margot RamirezUniversidad Catolica Boliviana, Santa Cruz, Plurinational State of Bolivia.
Eliana SaenzaUniversidad Catolica Boliviana, Santa Cruz, Plurinational State of Bolivia.
Edith MalagaLaboratorio de Investigación en Enfermedades Infecciosas, Facultad de Ciencias y Filosofías, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Gerardo SanchezLaboratorio de Investigación en Enfermedades Infecciosas, Facultad de Ciencias y Filosofías, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Emi E OkamotoNew York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Jacqueline E SherbuckNew York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Eva H ClarkBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Gerson Galdos-CardenasUniversidad Catolica Boliviana, Santa Cruz, Plurinational State of Bolivia Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Ricardo BozoHospital Municipal Camiri, Camiri, Plurinational State of Bolivia.
Jorge Luis Flores-FrancoUniversidad Catolica Boliviana, Santa Cruz, Plurinational State of Bolivia.
Rony ColanziUniversidad Catolica Boliviana, Santa Cruz, Plurinational State of Bolivia.
Manuela VerasteguiLaboratorio de Investigación en Enfermedades Infecciosas, Facultad de Ciencias y Filosofías, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Caryn BernUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA Caryn.Bern2@UCSF.EDU.
New York University · USBaylor College of Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · USSaint Louis University · US

Funding

Early Detection of Congenital Chagas DiseaseR01AI087776 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GILMAN, ROBERT H · 2010 to 2014
$2.9M
Infectious Diseases Training Program in PeruD43TW006581 · FIC · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GILMAN, ROBERT H · 2003 to 2012
$2.4M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW006581Medical Research Council MR/K007467/1NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI087776NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI087776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trypanosoma cruzi causes Chagas disease, which affects an estimated 7 million to 8 million people. Chagas disease is endemic throughout Latin America, with the highest prevalence in Bolivia. Conventional diagnosis requires a well-equipped laboratory with experienced personnel. We evaluated the Chagas Detect Plus (CDP) (InBios, Seattle, WA), a rapid immunochromatographic assay for IgG antibodies to T. cruzi. CDP performance was compared to infection status based on results obtained by indirect hemagglutination assay, immunofluorescent-antibody test, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Confirmed infection required positive results by at least 2 conventional assays. We used specimens from adults of both sexes in a general hospital in the city of Santa Cruz and from pregnant women in a hospital and children in villages in the Bolivian Chaco, an area of hyperendemicity. CDP was performed in paired whole-blood and serum specimens from 385 individuals in the two hospital studies and in 200 serum specimens from the community study. CDP showed sensitivities/specificities of 96.2% (95% confidence interval, 92.7 to 98.4)/98.8% (95.9 to 99.9) in whole blood and 99.3% (97.5 to 99.9)/96.9% (94.2 to 98.6) in serum, with no differences by sex, age group, or study site. CDP showed excellent sensitivity and specificity in our study population, comparable to those of conventional serology. The test is reliable for field surveys, requires no laboratory equipment, and performed well in serum and whole blood. The CDP could also be used for accurate maternal screening to identify neonates at risk of congenital transmission. CDP performance data in diverse geographic areas are needed to strengthen the evidence base for its use.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, ProtozoanBoliviaChagas DiseaseChildChild, PreschoolChromatography, AffinityFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedPregnancyAntibodies, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID25274804
PMCPMC4248774
OpenAlexW2154282189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.