Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25274453›Full record

Observational studyNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2014

Impact of multiple-dose versus single-dose inhaler devices on COPD patients' persistence with long-acting β₂-agonists: a dispensing database analysis.

Job F M van Boven, Joost J van Raaij, Ruben van der Galiën, Maarten J Postma, Thys van der Molen, P N Richard Dekhuijzen, Stefan Vegter

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Methods to assess COPD medications adherence in healthcare databases: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Interferon-Disease markers · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Job F M van BovenUnit of PharmacoEpidemiology and PharmacoEconomics, Department of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Joost J van RaaijUnit of PharmacoEpidemiology and PharmacoEconomics, Department of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ruben van der GaliënUnit of PharmacoEpidemiology and PharmacoEconomics, Department of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Maarten J PostmaUnit of PharmacoEpidemiology and PharmacoEconomics, Department of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Thys van der MolenDepartment of Primary Care, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
P N Richard DekhuijzenDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Stefan VegterUnit of PharmacoEpidemiology and PharmacoEconomics, Department of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
University of Groningen · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith a growing availability of different devices and types of medication, additional evidence is required to assist clinicians in prescribing the optimal medication in relation to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients' persistence with long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs).

aimsTo assess the impact of the type of inhaler device (multiple-dose versus single-dose inhalers) on 1-year persistence and switching patterns with LABAs.

methodsA retrospective observational cohort study was performed comparing a cohort of patients initiating multiple-dose inhalers and a cohort initiating single-dose inhalers. The study population consisted of long-acting bronchodilator naive COPD patients, initiating inhalation therapy with mono-LABAs (formoterol, indacaterol or salmeterol). Analyses were performed using pharmacy dispensing data from 1994 to 2012, obtained from the IADB.nl database. Study outcomes were 1-year persistence and switching patterns. RESULTS were adjusted for initial prescriber, initial medication, dosing regimen and relevant comorbidities.

resultsIn all, 575 patients initiating LABAs were included in the final study cohort. Among them, 475 (83%) initiated a multiple-dose inhaler and 100 (17%) a single-dose inhaler. Further, 269 (47%) initiated formoterol, 9 (2%) indacaterol and 297 (52%) salmeterol. There was no significant difference in persistence between users of multiple-dose or single-dose inhalers (hazard ratio: 0.98, 95% confidence interval: 0.76-1.26, P=0.99). Over 80% re-started or switched medication.

conclusionsThere seems no impact of inhaler device (multiple-dose versus single-dose inhalers) on COPD patients' persistence with LABAs. Over 80% of patients who initially seemed to discontinue LABAs, re-started their initial medication or switched inhalers or medication within 1 year.

Indexed as

Metered Dose InhalersAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsAgedAlbuterolCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualEthanolaminesFemaleFormoterol FumarateHumansIndansMalePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQuinolonesRetrospective StudiesSalmeterol XinafoateAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsAlbuterolEthanolaminesFormoterol FumarateindacaterolIndansQuinolonesSalmeterol Xinafoate

Identifiers

PMID25274453
PMCPMC4373462
OpenAlexW2099892391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.