Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25274366›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2014

Biogeographic patterns in below-ground diversity in New York City's Central Park are similar to those observed globally.

Kelly S Ramirez, Jonathan W Leff, Albert Barberán, Scott Thomas Bates, Jason Betley, Thomas W Crowther, Eugene F Kelly, Emily E Oldfield, E Ashley Shaw, Christopher Steenbock and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Toward development of soil-derivedBiodesign research · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Global climate gradients structure soilbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. AssessingScience advances · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kelly S RamirezSchool of Global Environmental Sustainability, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Jonathan W LeffDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Albert BarberánCooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Scott Thomas BatesDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA.
Jason BetleyIllumina UK, Chesterford Research Park, Little Chesterford, Saffron Walden, Essex CB10 1XL, UK.
Thomas W CrowtherSchool of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
Eugene F KellyDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Emily E OldfieldSchool of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
E Ashley ShawDepartment of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Christopher SteenbockDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Mark A BradfordSchool of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
Diana H WallSchool of Global Environmental Sustainability, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Noah FiererDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA noah.fierer@colorado.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil biota play key roles in the functioning of terrestrial ecosystems, however, compared to our knowledge of above-ground plant and animal diversity, the biodiversity found in soils remains largely uncharacterized. Here, we present an assessment of soil biodiversity and biogeographic patterns across Central Park in New York City that spanned all three domains of life, demonstrating that even an urban, managed system harbours large amounts of undescribed soil biodiversity. Despite high variability across the Park, below-ground diversity patterns were predictable based on soil characteristics, with prokaryotic and eukaryotic communities exhibiting overlapping biogeographic patterns. Further, Central Park soils harboured nearly as many distinct soil microbial phylotypes and types of soil communities as we found in biomes across the globe (including arctic, tropical and desert soils). This integrated cross-domain investigation highlights that the amount and patterning of novel and uncharacterized diversity at a single urban location matches that observed across natural ecosystems spanning multiple biomes and continents.

Indexed as

BiodiversitySoilSoil MicrobiologyMolecular Sequence DataNew York CityRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 18SSequence Analysis, DNARNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 18SSoil16S rRNA gene18S rRNA geneArchaeaBacteriaEukaryasoil biodiversity

Identifiers

PMID25274366
PMCPMC4213626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.