Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25274365›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2014

Fatal attraction: vegetation responses to nutrient inputs attract herbivores to infectious anthrax carcass sites.

Wendy C Turner, Kyrre L Kausrud, Yathin S Krishnappa, Joris P G M Cromsigt, Holly H Ganz, Isaac Mapaure, Claudine C Cloete, Zepee Havarua, Martina Küsters, Wayne M Getz and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Sublethal effects of parasitism on ruminants can have cascading consequences for ecosystems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. InvestigatingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Persistence in time: the hunt forApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Anthrax: A narrative review.New microbes and new infections · 2024
    Review
  15. Soil Sample Analysis ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Reference genome assembly and annotation of twoMicrobiology resource announcements · 2023
    Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Wendy C TurnerCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, PO Box 1066 Blindern, Oslo 0361, Norway Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, 137 Mulford Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-3112, USA wendycturner@gmail.com.
Kyrre L KausrudCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, PO Box 1066 Blindern, Oslo 0361, Norway.
Yathin S KrishnappaCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, PO Box 1066 Blindern, Oslo 0361, Norway.
Joris P G M CromsigtDepartment of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Skogsmarksgränd, Umeå 90183, Sweden Centre for African Conservation Ecology, Department of Zoology, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, PO Box 77000, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.
Holly H GanzDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, 137 Mulford Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-3112, USA Genome Center and Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Isaac MapaureDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Namibia, Private Bag 13301, Windhoek, Namibia.
Claudine C CloeteDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Namibia, Private Bag 13301, Windhoek, Namibia Etosha Ecological Institute, Ministry of Environment and Tourism, Etosha National Park, PO Box 6, Okaukuejo, Namibia.
Zepee HavaruaDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Namibia, Private Bag 13301, Windhoek, Namibia.
Martina KüstersBerkeley Etosha Anthrax Research Project, Swakopmund, Namibia.
Wayne M GetzDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, 137 Mulford Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-3112, USA School of Mathematical Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X54001, Durban 4000, South Africa.
Nils Chr StensethCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, PO Box 1066 Blindern, Oslo 0361, Norway.

Funding

The ecology of environmentally maintained episodic anthrax in Esotha, NamibiaR01GM083863 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI GETZ, WAYNE M · 2008 to 2011
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM083863NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parasites can shape the foraging behaviour of their hosts through cues indicating risk of infection. When cues for risk co-occur with desired traits such as forage quality, individuals face a trade-off between nutrient acquisition and parasite exposure. We evaluated how this trade-off may influence disease transmission in a 3-year experimental study of anthrax in a guild of mammalian herbivores in Etosha National Park, Namibia. At plains zebra (Equus quagga) carcass sites we assessed (i) carcass nutrient effects on soils and grasses, (ii) concentrations of Bacillus anthracis (BA) on grasses and in soils, and (iii) herbivore grazing behaviour, compared with control sites, using motion-sensing camera traps. We found that carcass-mediated nutrient pulses improved soil and vegetation, and that BA is found on grasses up to 2 years after death. Host foraging responses to carcass sites shifted from avoidance to attraction, and ultimately to no preference, with the strength and duration of these behavioural responses varying among herbivore species. Our results demonstrate that animal carcasses alter the environment and attract grazing hosts to parasite aggregations. This attraction may enhance transmission rates, suggesting that hosts are limited in their ability to trade off nutrient intake with parasite avoidance when relying on indirect cues.

Indexed as

EquidaeFeeding BehaviorAnimalsAnthraxBacillus anthracisCadaverLongitudinal StudiesNamibiaPoaceaeSoilSpecies SpecificitySoilanthraxcamera trapsdisease transmissionforaging ecologyhost–pathogen contactparasite avoidance

Identifiers

PMID25274365
PMCPMC4213624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.