SynthesisKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2016
No difference in clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty between patellar eversion and non-eversion.
Synthesis in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Postoperative Effects of Patellar Eversion in Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.BioMed research international · 2022Pooled it
- Comparison of Postoperative Events between Spinal Anesthesia and General Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.BioMed research international · 2016Pooled it
- Dexamethasone versus ondansetron in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC anesthesiology · 2015Pooled it
- Patellar retraction versus eversion on functional outcomes in total knee replacement: a randomized controlled study protocol.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2021Article
- Lower limb joint repair and replacement: an overview.F1000Research · 2019Review
- The Interaction of Smoking with Gene Polymorphisms on Four Digestive Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of Cancer · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMultiple surgical techniques in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are associated with clinical differences. However, whether patellar eversion impairs clinical outcomes remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to provide current understanding on this topic.
methodsA literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases was performed to identify RCTs comparing patellar eversion with patellar non-eversion (PN). Two authors independently selected the studies, assessed methodological quality, and extracted data.
resultsFive RCTs involving 379 knees were included. The results revealed no significant differences in functional scores, pain, quality of life, quadriceps strength, patellar height, alignment, or complication rate between patellar eversion and PN. Power analysis showed that the power of the individual study and meta-analysis ranged from 5.0 to 70.8%, with the exception of the power of alignment and patellar height in two of the individual studies, which was 100.0 and 99.9%, respectively.
conclusionsBased on the current evidence, patellar eversion during TKA could not definitely lead to inferior postoperative outcomes. Patellar eversion and patellar non-eversion could achieve similar clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review and meta-analysis, Level I.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25274093What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.