ArticlePalliative & supportive care2015
Patients' priorities for treatment decision making during periods of incapacity: quantitative survey.
Article in Palliative & supportive care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02898194 (Focus Groups to Determine Surrogates' Views Regarding Patient Preference Predictors), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Focus Groups to Determine Surrogates' Views Regarding Patient Preference Predictors
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Stresses of Surrogate Decision-Making: Contributing Factors and Clinicians' Role in Mitigation.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2024Article
- Patient Experience Information: Streamlining and Harmonizing the Collection of Patient Preference and Patient-Reported Outcomes Data.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2020Article
- Perioperative Management of Elderly patients (PriME): recommendations from an Italian intersociety consensus.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2020Review
- Achieving Goal-Concordant Care: A Conceptual Model and Approach to Measuring Serious Illness Communication and Its Impact.Journal of palliative medicine · 2018Review
- A systematic review of questionnaires about patient's values and preferences in clinical practice guidelines.Patient preference and adherence · 2018Review
- Surrogate Perspectives on Patient Preference Predictors: Good Idea, but I Should Decide How They Are Used.AJOB empirical bioethicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveClinical practice aims to respect patient autonomy by basing treatment decisions for incapacitated patients on their own preferences. Yet many patients do not complete an advance directive, and those who do frequently just designate a family member to make decisions for them. This finding raises the concern that clinical practice may be based on a mistaken understanding of patient priorities. The present study aimed to collect systematic data on how patients prioritize the goals of treatment decision making.
methodWe employed a self-administered, quantitative survey of patients in a tertiary care center.
resultsSome 80% or more of the 1169 respondents (response rate = 59.8%) ranked six of eight listed goals for treatment decision making as important. When asked which goal was most important, 38.8% identified obtaining desired or avoiding unwanted treatments, 20.0% identified minimizing stress or financial burden on their family, and 14.6% identified having their family help to make treatment decisions. No single goal was designated as most important by 25.0% of participants. SIGNIFICANCE OF
resultsPatients endorsed three primary goals with respect to decision making during periods of incapacity: being treated consistent with their own preferences; minimizing the burden on their family; and involving their family in the decision-making process. However, no single goal was prioritized by a clear majority of patients. These findings suggest that advance care planning should not be limited to documenting patients' treatment preferences. Clinicians should also discuss and document patients' priorities for how decisions are to be made. Moreover, future research should evaluate ways to modify current practice to promote all three of patients primary goals for treatment decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.