Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25273080›Full record

Observational studyClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2015

Increased virological failure in naive HIV-1-infected patients taking lamivudine compared with emtricitabine in combination with tenofovir and efavirenz or nevirapine in the Dutch nationwide ATHENA cohort.

Casper Rokx, Azzania Fibriani, David A M C van de Vijver, Annelies Verbon, Martin Schutten, Luuk Gras, Bart J A Rijnders, AIDS Therapy Evaluation in the Netherlands National Observational Cohort

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Twenty-Five Years of Lamivudine: Current and Future Use for the Treatment of HIV-1 Infection.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2018
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Superior Effectiveness of Zidovudine Compared With Tenofovir When Combined With Nevirapine-based Antiretroviral Therapy in a Large Nigerian Cohort.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016
    Article
  11. Editorial commentary: Comparative efficacy of lamivudine and emtricitabine: comparing the results of randomized trials and cohorts.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Casper RokxDepartments of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases.
Azzania FibrianiVirology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam.
David A M C van de VijverVirology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam.
Annelies VerbonDepartments of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases.
Martin SchuttenVirology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam.
Luuk GrasStichting HIV Monitoring, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bart J A RijndersDepartments of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases.
AIDS Therapy Evaluation in the Netherlands National Observational Cohort
Erasmus MC · NLStichting HIV Monitoring · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGuidelines for treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection consider lamivudine and emtricitabine to be interchangeable components in first-line combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). The evidence for their clinical equivalence in cART is inconsistent. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the virological responses to lamivudine and emtricitabine in recommended cART.

methodsThis was an observational study using data from the AIDS Therapy Evaluation in the Netherlands (ATHENA) nationwide HIV cohort. The virological responses to lamivudine and emtricitabine were compared by multivariable adjusted logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models. Sensitivity analyses included propensity score-adjusted models.

resultsTherapy-naive HIV-1-infected patients without baseline resistance (N = 4740) initiated lamivudine or emtricitabine with efavirenz/tenofovir or nevirapine/tenofovir. The use of lamivudine was associated with more virological failure at week 48 compared to emtricitabine with efavirenz/tenofovir (10.8% vs 3.6%; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-2.84) and nevirapine/tenofovir (27% vs 11%; AOR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.25-3.52) in on-treatment analysis. Propensity score-adjusted models and intent-to-treat sensitivity analyses gave comparable results. The adjusted hazard ratio of virological failure at week 240 using lamivudine instead of emtricitabine was 2.35 (95% CI, 1.61-3.42) with efavirenz and 2.01 (95% CI, 1.36-2.98) with nevirapine. The inclusion of lamivudine or emtricitabine in cART did not influence the time to virological suppression within 48 weeks or the probability of virological rebound after successful virological suppression.

conclusionsThe use of emtricitabine instead of lamivudine as part of cART was associated with better virological responses. These findings are relevant for settings with extensive use of lamivudine and for settings where generic lamivudine will be available.

Indexed as

Viral LoadAdultAnti-Retroviral AgentsAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveCohort StudiesFemaleHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsTreatment FailureAnti-Retroviral Agentsantiretroviral therapyemtricitabineHIV-1lamivudinevirological failure

Identifiers

PMID25273080
OpenAlexW2046958139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.