Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25272959›Full record

ArticleRespiratory research2014

Effects of different mesenchymal stromal cell sources and delivery routes in experimental emphysema.

Mariana A Antunes, Soraia C Abreu, Fernanda F Cruz, Ana Clara Teixeira, Miquéias Lopes-Pacheco, Elga Bandeira, Priscilla C Olsen, Bruno L Diaz, Christina M Takyia, Isalira P R G Freitas and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 106 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 164 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Regenerative and translational medicine in COPD: hype and hope.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mariana A Antunes
Soraia C Abreu
Fernanda F Cruz
Ana Clara Teixeira
Miquéias Lopes-Pacheco
Elga Bandeira
Priscilla C Olsen
Bruno L Diaz
Christina M Takyia
Isalira P R G Freitas
Nazareth N Rocha
Vera L Capelozzi
Débora G Xisto
Daniel J Weiss
Marcelo M Morales
Patricia R M Rocco
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal Fluminense · BRUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We sought to assess whether the effects of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) on lung inflammation and remodeling in experimental emphysema would differ according to MSC source and administration route. Emphysema was induced in C57BL/6 mice by intratracheal (IT) administration of porcine pancreatic elastase (0.1 UI) weekly for 1 month. After the last elastase instillation, saline or MSCs (1×105), isolated from either mouse bone marrow (BM), adipose tissue (AD) or lung tissue (L), were administered intravenously (IV) or IT. After 1 week, mice were euthanized. Regardless of administration route, MSCs from each source yielded: 1) decreased mean linear intercept, neutrophil infiltration, and cell apoptosis; 2) increased elastic fiber content; 3) reduced alveolar epithelial and endothelial cell damage; and 4) decreased keratinocyte-derived chemokine (KC, a mouse analog of interleukin-8) and transforming growth factor-β levels in lung tissue. In contrast with IV, IT MSC administration further reduced alveolar hyperinflation (BM-MSC) and collagen fiber content (BM-MSC and L-MSC). Intravenous administration of BM- and AD-MSCs reduced the number of M1 macrophages and pulmonary hypertension on echocardiography, while increasing vascular endothelial growth factor. Only BM-MSCs (IV > IT) increased the number of M2 macrophages. In conclusion, different MSC sources and administration routes variably reduced elastase-induced lung damage, but IV administration of BM-MSCs resulted in better cardiovascular function and change of the macrophage phenotype from M1 to M2.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone Marrow CellsCells, CulturedMaleMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPulmonary EmphysemaRandom AllocationTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25272959
PMCPMC4189723
OpenAlexW2052506174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.