ArticleBMC bioinformatics2014
Prediction of uridine modifications in tRNA sequences.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Complexation of Polypeptides and Polypeptoids with Nucleic Acids: Does Chirality Matter for Salt Stability and Morphology?Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Complex transcriptional regulations of a hyperparasitic quadripartite system in giant viruses infecting protists.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Review
- Dynamic regulation and key roles of ribonucleic acid methylation.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022Review
- Article
- Pacmanvirus S19, the Second Pacmanvirus Isolated from Sewage Waters in Oran, Algeria.Microbiology resource announcements · 2021Article
- Article
- Is There Any Sequence Feature in the RNA Pseudouridine Modification Prediction Problem?Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2020Article
- iterb-PPse: Identification of transcriptional terminators in bacterial by incorporating nucleotide properties into PseKNC.PloS one · 2020Article
- To be or not to be modified: Miscellaneous aspects influencing nucleotide modifications in tRNAs.IUBMB life · 2019Review
- Review
- Accurate prediction of personalized olfactory perception from large-scale chemoinformatic features.GigaScience · 2018Article
- Recent Advances in Identification of RNA Modifications.Non-coding RNA · 2016Review
- tRNAmodpred: A computational method for predicting posttranscriptional modifications in tRNAs.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2016Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn past number of methods have been developed for predicting post-translational modifications in proteins. In contrast, limited attempt has been made to understand post-transcriptional modifications. Recently it has been shown that tRNA modifications play direct role in the genome structure and codon usage. This study is an attempt to understand kingdom-wise tRNA modifications particularly uridine modifications (UMs), as majority of modifications are uridine-derived.
resultsA three-steps strategy has been applied to develop an efficient method for the prediction of UMs. In the first step, we developed a common prediction model for all the kingdoms using a dataset from MODOMICS-2008. Support Vector Machine (SVM) based prediction models were developed and evaluated by five-fold cross-validation technique. Different approaches were applied and found that a hybrid approach of binary and structural information achieved highest Area under the curve (AUC) of 0.936. In the second step, we used newly added tRNA sequences (as independent dataset) of MODOMICS-2012 for the kingdom-wise prediction performance evaluation of previously developed (in the first step) common model and achieved performances between the AUC of 0.910 to 0.949. In the third and last step, we used different datasets from MODOMICS-2012 for the kingdom-wise individual prediction models development and achieved performances between the AUC of 0.915 to 0.987.
conclusionsThe hybrid approach is efficient not only to predict kingdom-wise modifications but also to classify them into two most prominent UMs: Pseudouridine (Y) and Dihydrouridine (D). A webserver called tRNAmod (http://crdd.osdd.net/raghava/trnamod/) has been developed, which predicts UMs from both tRNA sequences and whole genome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.