Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25272148›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol review2016

Challenges and opportunities in using wastewater analysis to measure drug use in a small prison facility.

Emma van Dyken, Foon Yin Lai, Phong K Thai, Christoph Ort, Raimondo Bruno, Wayne Hall, K Paul Kirkbride, Jochen F Mueller, Jeremy Prichard

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol review, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Analysis of 39 drugs and metabolites, including 8 glucuronide conjugates, in an upstream wastewater network via HPLC-MS/MS.Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Interpol review of controlled substances 2016-2019.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Emma van DykenLaw Faculty, The University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Foon Yin LaiNational Research Centre for Environmental Toxicology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Phong K ThaiNational Research Centre for Environmental Toxicology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Christoph OrtAdvanced Water Management Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Raimondo BrunoSchool of Psychology, The University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6673-833X
Wayne HallCentre for Youth Substance Abuse Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
K Paul KirkbrideSchool of Chemical and Physical Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Jochen F MuellerNational Research Centre for Environmental Toxicology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Jeremy PrichardLaw Faculty, The University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
The University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Tasmania · AUFlinders University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND

aimsWastewater analysis (WWA) is intended to be a direct and objective method of measuring substance use in large urban populations. It has also been used to measure prison substance use in two previous studies. The application of WWA in this context has raised questions as to how best it might be used to measure illicit drug use in prisons, and whether it can also be used to measure prescription misuse. We applied WWA to a small regional prison to measure the use of 12 licit and illicit substances. We attempted to measure the non-medical use of methadone and buprenorphine and to compare our findings with the results of the prison's mandatory drug testing (MDT). DESIGN AND

methodsRepresentative daily composite samples were collected for two periods of 12 consecutive days in May to July 2013 and analysed for 18 drug metabolites. Prescription data and MDT results were obtained from the prison and compared with the substance use estimates calculated from WWA data.

resultsDaily use of methamphetamine, methadone, buprenorphine and codeine was detected, while sporadic detection of ketamine and methylone was also observed. Overall buprenorphine misuse appeared to be greater than methadone misuse. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsCompared with MDT, WWA provides a more comprehensive picture of prison substance use. WWA also has the potential to measure the misuse of medically prescribed substances. However, a great deal of care must be exercised in quantifying the usage of any substance in small populations, such as in prisons.

Indexed as

PrisonsBuprenorphineHumansIllicit DrugsMaleMethadonePrescription Drug MisusePrisonersSubstance Abuse DetectionSubstance-Related DisordersWastewaterBuprenorphineIllicit DrugsMethadoneWastewaterAustraliaprescription misuseprisonsewage epidemiologyurinalysis

Identifiers

PMID25272148
OpenAlexW2144046038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.