Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25271838›Full record

ArticleCurrent protocols in human genetics2014

RNA-seq Data: Challenges in and Recommendations for Experimental Design and Analysis.

Alexander G Williams, Sean Thomas, Stacia K Wyman, Alisha K Holloway

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current protocols in human genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Differential Expression of Small Non-Coding RNAs in Uterine Leiomyomas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Transcriptomic Profile of Canine DH82 Macrophages Infected byInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexander G WilliamsGladstone Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, San Francisco, California.
Sean Thomas
Stacia K Wyman
Alisha K Holloway

Funding

NHLBI Pediatric Translational Consortium Administrative Coordinating CenterU01HL098188 · NHLBI · NEW ENGLAND RESEARCH INSTITUTES, INC. · PI HAMZA, TAYE, MILLER, JULIE ELAINE · 2009 to 2015
$41.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL098188NHLBI NIH HHS U01HL098188
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA-seq is widely used to determine differential expression of genes or transcripts as well as identify novel transcripts, identify allele-specific expression, and precisely measure translation of transcripts. Thoughtful experimental design and choice of analysis tools are critical to ensure high-quality data and interpretable results. Important considerations for experimental design include number of replicates, whether to collect paired-end or single-end reads, sequence length, and sequencing depth. Common analysis steps in all RNA-seq experiments include quality control, read alignment, assigning reads to genes or transcripts, and estimating gene or transcript abundance. Our aims are two-fold: to make recommendations for common components of experimental design and assess tool capabilities for each of these steps. We also test tools designed to detect differential expression, since this is the most widespread application of RNA-seq. We hope that these analyses will help guide those who are new to RNA-seq and will generate discussion about remaining needs for tool improvement and development.

Indexed as

Sequence Analysis, RNAPolymerase Chain ReactionQuality ControlRNA, MessengerRNA SplicingRNA, Messengerbiological replicatesdifferential expressionpaired-end sequencingRNA-seq experimental designsequence lengthsequencing depthsplice-aware alignmenttranscript abundance

Identifiers

PMID25271838
PMCPMC4230301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.