Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25271833›Full record

ArticleCancers2014

Gefitinib plus interleukin-2 in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients previously treated with chemotherapy.

Melissa Bersanelli, Sebastiano Buti, Roberta Camisa, Matteo Brighenti, Silvia Lazzarelli, Giancarlo Mazza, Rodolfo Passalacqua

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Recent updates on cancer immunotherapy.Precision clinical medicine · 2018
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The past, present and future of immunotherapy against tumor.Translational lung cancer research · 2015
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa BersanelliOncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Via Gramsci, 14, 43126 Parma, Italy. melissa.bersanelli@alice.it.
Sebastiano ButiOncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Via Gramsci, 14, 43126 Parma, Italy. sebabuti@libero.it.
Roberta CamisaOncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Via Gramsci, 14, 43126 Parma, Italy. rcamisa@ao.pr.it.
Matteo BrighentiOncology Unit, Azienda Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona, Largo Priori, 1, 26100 Cremona, Italy. m.brighenti@ospedale.cremona.it.
Silvia LazzarelliOncology Unit, Azienda Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona, Largo Priori, 1, 26100 Cremona, Italy. s.lazzarelli@ospedale.cremona.it.
Giancarlo MazzaRadiology Division, Spedali Civili di Brescia, P.le Spedali Civili,1, 25123 Brescia, Italy. radiologia1@spedalicivili.brescia.it.
Rodolfo PassalacquaOncology Unit, Azienda Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona, Largo Priori, 1, 26100 Cremona, Italy. r.passalacqua@ospedale.cremona.it.
Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona · ITUniversity of Parma · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The activation of lymphocytes by gefitinib treatment has been described. In this phase II pilot trial, we explored the possible synergism between IL-2 and gefitinib for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. From September, 2003, to November, 2006, 70 consecutive patients with advanced, progressive NSCLC, previously treated with chemotherapy, received oral gefitinib 250 mg daily. The first 39 patients received gefitinib alone (G group). The other 31 also received subcutaneous IL-2 (GIL-2 group): 1 MIU/m2 (Million International Unit/m2)twice a day on Days 1 and 2, once a day on Days 3, 4, 5 every week for four consecutive weeks with a four-week rest period. Median follow-up was 25.2 months. Grade 3-4 toxicity of gefitinib was represented by skin rash (7%), asthenia/anorexia (6%) and diarrhea (7%); patients treated with IL-2 showed grade 2-3 fever (46%), fatigue (21%) and arthralgia (13%). In the GIL-2 group and G-group, we respectively observed: an overall response rate of 16.1% (6.4% complete response) and 5.1% (only partial response); a disease control rate of 41.9% and 41%; a median time to progression of 3.5 (CI 95% = 3.2-3.8) and 4.1 (CI 95% = 2.6-5.7) months; a median overall survival of 20.1 (CI 95% = 5.1-35.1) and 6.9 (CI 95% = 4.9-8.9) months (p = 0.002); and an actuarial one-year survival rate of 54% and 30%. Skin toxicity (p < 0.001; HR = 0.29; CI 95% = 0.16-0.54) and use of IL-2 (p < 0.001; HR = 0.33; CI 95% = 0.18-0.60) were independently associated with improvement of survival. In this consecutive, non-randomized, series of advanced NSCLC patients, the use of IL-2 increased the efficacy of gefitinib.

Identifiers

PMID25271833
PMCPMC4276955
OpenAlexW1513448125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.